Liu Bo [Wed, 13 Mar 2013 13:43:03 +0000 (07:43 -0600)]
Btrfs: fix warning when creating snapshots
Creating snapshot passes extent_root to commit its transaction,
but it can lead to the warning of checking root for quota in
the __btrfs_end_transaction() when someone else is committing
the current transaction. Since we've recorded the needed root
in trans_handle, just use it to get rid of the warning.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Wang Shilong [Wed, 6 Mar 2013 11:51:47 +0000 (11:51 +0000)]
Btrfs: return as soon as possible when edquot happens
If one of qgroup fails to reserve firstly, we should return immediately,
it is unnecessary to continue check.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Fri, 8 Mar 2013 20:41:02 +0000 (15:41 -0500)]
Btrfs: return EIO if we have extent tree corruption
The callers of lookup_inline_extent_info all handle getting an error back
properly, so return an error if we have corruption instead of being a jerk and
panicing. Still WARN_ON() since this is kind of crucial and I've been seeing it
a bit too much recently for my taste, I think we're doing something wrong
somewhere. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Eric Sandeen [Sat, 9 Mar 2013 15:18:39 +0000 (15:18 +0000)]
btrfs: use rcu_barrier() to wait for bdev puts at unmount
Doing this would reliably fail with -EBUSY for me:
# mount /dev/sdb2 /mnt/scratch; umount /mnt/scratch; mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb2
...
unable to open /dev/sdb2: Device or resource busy
because mkfs.btrfs tries to open the device O_EXCL, and somebody still has it.
Using systemtap to track bdev gets & puts shows a kworker thread doing a
blkdev put after mkfs attempts a get; this is left over from the unmount
path:
btrfs_close_devices
__btrfs_close_devices
call_rcu(&device->rcu, free_device);
free_device
INIT_WORK(&device->rcu_work, __free_device);
schedule_work(&device->rcu_work);
so unmount might complete before __free_device fires & does its blkdev_put.
Adding an rcu_barrier() to btrfs_close_devices() causes unmount to wait
until all blkdev_put()s are done, and the device is truly free once
unmount completes.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Liu Bo [Mon, 11 Mar 2013 09:37:45 +0000 (09:37 +0000)]
Btrfs: remove btrfs_try_spin_lock
Remove a useless function declaration
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Liu Bo [Mon, 11 Mar 2013 09:20:58 +0000 (09:20 +0000)]
Btrfs: get better concurrency for snapshot-aware defrag work
Using spinning case instead of blocking will result in better concurrency
overall.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Chris Mason [Mon, 4 Mar 2013 22:13:31 +0000 (17:13 -0500)]
Btrfs: improve the delayed inode throttling
The delayed inode code batches up changes to the btree in hopes of doing
them in bulk. As the changes build up, processes kick off worker
threads and wait for them to make progress.
The current code kicks off an async work queue item for each delayed
node, which creates a lot of churn. It also uses a fixed 1 HZ waiting
period for the throttle, which allows us to build a lot of pending
work and can slow down the commit.
This changes us to watch a sequence counter as it is bumped during the
operations. We kick off fewer work items and have each work item do
more work.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Ilya Dryomov [Wed, 6 Mar 2013 08:57:55 +0000 (01:57 -0700)]
Btrfs: fix a mismerge in btrfs_balance()
Raid56 merge (merge commit
e942f88) had mistakenly removed a call to
__cancel_balance(), which resulted in balance not cleaning up after itself
after a successful finish. (Cleanup includes switching the state, removing
the balance item and releasing mut_ex_op testnset lock.) Bring it back.
Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Chris Mason [Thu, 7 Mar 2013 00:46:29 +0000 (19:46 -0500)]
Merge branch 'master' of git://git./linux/kernel/git/josef/btrfs-next into for-linus-3.9
Chris Mason [Tue, 5 Mar 2013 16:11:26 +0000 (11:11 -0500)]
Btrfs: enforce min_bytes parameter during extent allocation
Commit
24542bf7ea5e4fdfdb5157ff544c093fa4dcb536 changed preallocation of
extents to cap the max size we try to allocate. It's a valid change,
but the extent reservation code is also used by balance, and that
can't tolerate a smaller extent being allocated.
__btrfs_prealloc_file_range already has a min_size parameter, which is
used by relocation to request a specific extent size. This commit
adds an extra check to enforce that minimum extent size.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Reported-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Stefan Behrens [Mon, 4 Mar 2013 17:28:38 +0000 (17:28 +0000)]
Btrfs: allow running defrag in parallel to administrative tasks
Commit
5ac00add added a testnset mutex and code that disallows
running administrative tasks in parallel. It is prevented that
the device add/delete/balance/replace/resize operations are
started in parallel. By mistake, the defragmentation operation
was included in the check for mutually exclusiveness as well.
This is fixed with this commit.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Liu Bo [Mon, 4 Mar 2013 16:25:41 +0000 (16:25 +0000)]
Btrfs: avoid deadlock on transaction waiting list
Only let one trans handle to wait for other handles, otherwise we
will get ABBA issues.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Liu Bo [Mon, 4 Mar 2013 16:25:40 +0000 (16:25 +0000)]
Btrfs: do not BUG_ON on aborted situation
Btrfs balance can easily hit BUG_ON in these places, but we want
to it bail out gracefully after we force the whole filesystem to
readonly. So we use btrfs_std_error hook in place of BUG_ON.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Liu Bo [Mon, 4 Mar 2013 16:25:39 +0000 (16:25 +0000)]
Btrfs: do not BUG_ON in prepare_to_reloc
We can bail out from here gracefully instead of a cold BUG_ON.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Liu Bo [Mon, 4 Mar 2013 16:25:38 +0000 (16:25 +0000)]
Btrfs: free all recorded tree blocks on error
We've missed the 'free blocks' part on ENOMEM error.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Liu Bo [Mon, 4 Mar 2013 16:25:37 +0000 (16:25 +0000)]
Btrfs: build up error handling for merge_reloc_roots
We first use btrfs_std_error hook to replace with BUG_ON, and we
also need to cleanup what is left, including reloc roots rbtree
and reloc roots list.
Here we use a helper function to cleanup both rbtree and list, and
since this function can also be used in the balance recover path,
we also make the change as well to keep code simple.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Liu Bo [Mon, 4 Mar 2013 16:25:36 +0000 (16:25 +0000)]
Btrfs: check for NULL pointer in updating reloc roots
Add a check for NULL pointer to avoid invalid reference.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Miao Xie [Mon, 4 Mar 2013 09:45:06 +0000 (09:45 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix unclosed transaction handler when the async transaction commitment fails
If the async transaction commitment failed, we need close the
current transaction handler, or the current transaction will be
blocked to commit because of this orphan handler.
We fix the problem by doing sync transaction commitment, that is
to invoke btrfs_commit_transaction().
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Miao Xie [Mon, 4 Mar 2013 09:44:29 +0000 (09:44 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix wrong handle at error path of create_snapshot() when the commit fails
There are several bugs at error path of create_snapshot() when the
transaction commitment failed.
- access the freed transaction handler. At the end of the
transaction commitment, the transaction handler was freed, so we
should not access it after the transaction commitment.
- we were not aware of the error which happened during the snapshot
creation if we submitted a async transaction commitment.
- pending snapshot access vs pending snapshot free. when something
wrong happened after we submitted a async transaction commitment,
the transaction committer would cleanup the pending snapshots and
free them. But the snapshot creators were not aware of it, they
would access the freed pending snapshots.
This patch fixes the above problems by:
- remove the dangerous code that accessed the freed handler
- assign ->error if the error happens during the snapshot creation
- the transaction committer doesn't free the pending snapshots,
just assigns the error number and evicts them before we unblock
the transaction.
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Fri, 1 Mar 2013 18:35:47 +0000 (13:35 -0500)]
Btrfs: use set_nlink if our i_nlink is 0
We need to inc the nlink of deleted entries when running replay so we can do the
unlink on the fs_root and get everything cleaned up and then have the orphan
cleanup do the right thing. The problem is inc_nlink complains about this, even
thought it still does the right thing. So use set_nlink() if our i_nlink is 0
to keep users from seeing the warnings during log replay. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Geert Uytterhoeven [Sun, 3 Mar 2013 11:44:41 +0000 (04:44 -0700)]
btrfs/raid56: Add missing #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
tilegx_defconfig:
fs/btrfs/raid56.c: In function 'btrfs_alloc_stripe_hash_table':
fs/btrfs/raid56.c:206:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'vzalloc' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
fs/btrfs/raid56.c:206:9: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast [enabled by default]
fs/btrfs/raid56.c:226:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'vfree' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Paul Gortmaker [Thu, 14 Feb 2013 20:50:15 +0000 (13:50 -0700)]
btrfs: fixup/remove module.h usage as required
We want to avoid module.h where posible, since it in turn includes
nearly all of header space. This means removing it where it is not
required, and using export.h where we are only exporting symbols via
EXPORT_SYMBOL and friends.
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Fri, 1 Mar 2013 16:47:21 +0000 (11:47 -0500)]
Btrfs: delete inline extents when we find them during logging
Apparently when we do inline extents we allow the data to overlap the last chunk
of the btrfs_file_extent_item, which means that we can possibly have a
btrfs_file_extent_item that isn't actually as large as a btrfs_file_extent_item.
This messes with us when we try to overwrite the extent when logging new extents
since we expect for it to be the right size. To fix this just delete the item
and try to do the insert again which will give us the proper sized
btrfs_file_extent_item. This fixes a panic where map_private_extent_buffer
would blow up because we're trying to write past the end of the leaf. Thanks,
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
David Sterba [Fri, 1 Mar 2013 15:03:00 +0000 (15:03 +0000)]
btrfs: try harder to allocate raid56 stripe cache
The stripe hash table is large, starting with allocation order 4 and can go as
high as order 7 in case lock debugging is turned on and structure padding
happens.
Observed mount failure:
mount: page allocation failure: order:7, mode:0x200050
Pid: 8234, comm: mount Tainted: G W 3.8.0-default+ #267
Call Trace:
[<
ffffffff81114353>] warn_alloc_failed+0xf3/0x140
[<
ffffffff811171d2>] ? __alloc_pages_direct_compact+0x92/0x250
[<
ffffffff81117ac3>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x733/0x9d0
[<
ffffffff81152878>] ? cache_alloc_refill+0x3f8/0x840
[<
ffffffff811528bc>] cache_alloc_refill+0x43c/0x840
[<
ffffffff811302eb>] ? is_kernel_percpu_address+0x4b/0x90
[<
ffffffffa00a00ac>] ? btrfs_alloc_stripe_hash_table+0x5c/0x130 [btrfs]
[<
ffffffff811531d7>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x247/0x270
[<
ffffffffa00a00ac>] btrfs_alloc_stripe_hash_table+0x5c/0x130 [btrfs]
[<
ffffffffa003133f>] open_ctree+0xb2f/0x1f90 [btrfs]
[<
ffffffff81397289>] ? string+0x49/0xe0
[<
ffffffff813987b3>] ? vsnprintf+0x443/0x5d0
[<
ffffffffa0007cb6>] btrfs_mount+0x526/0x600 [btrfs]
[<
ffffffff8115127c>] ? cache_alloc_debugcheck_after+0x4c/0x200
[<
ffffffff81162b90>] mount_fs+0x20/0xe0
[<
ffffffff8117db26>] vfs_kern_mount+0x76/0x120
[<
ffffffff811801b6>] do_mount+0x386/0x980
[<
ffffffff8112a5cb>] ? strndup_user+0x5b/0x80
[<
ffffffff81180840>] sys_mount+0x90/0xe0
[<
ffffffff81962e99>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Wang Shilong [Fri, 1 Mar 2013 11:36:01 +0000 (11:36 +0000)]
Btrfs: cleanup to make the function btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata more logic
The original code is a little confusing and not clear, The right
way to deal with the kernel code like this:
[...]
if (ret)
goto out;
[...]
So i move the common clean_up code to the place labeled with
out_fail, this will be easier to maintain.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Wang Shilong [Fri, 1 Mar 2013 11:33:01 +0000 (11:33 +0000)]
Btrfs: don't call btrfs_qgroup_free if just btrfs_qgroup_reserve fails
commit
eb6b88d92c6df083dd09a8c471011e3788dfd7c6 leads into another bug.
If it is just because qgroup_reserve fails, the function btrfs_qgroup_free
should not be called, otherwise, it will cause the wrong quota accounting.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Wang Shilong [Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:21:40 +0000 (11:21 +0000)]
Btrfs: remove reduplicate check about root in the function btrfs_clean_quota_tree
The check work has been done just before the function btrfs_clean_quota_tree
is called, it is not necessary to check it again, remove it.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Wang Shilong [Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:20:56 +0000 (11:20 +0000)]
Btrfs: return ENOMEM rather than use BUG_ON when btrfs_alloc_path fails
Return ENOMEM rather trigger BUG_ON, fix it.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Wang Shilong [Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:16:57 +0000 (11:16 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix missing deleted items in btrfs_clean_quota_tree
Steps to reproduce:
i=0
ncases=100
mkfs.btrfs <disk>
mount <disk> <mnt>
btrfs quota enable <mnt>
btrfs qgroup create 2/1 <mnt>
while [ $i -le $ncases ]
do
btrfs qgroup create 1/$i <mnt>
btrfs qgroup assign 1/$i 2/1 <mnt>
i=$(($i+1))
done
btrfs quota disable <mnt>
umount <mnt>
btrfsck <mnt>
You can also use the commands:
btrfs-debug-tree <disk> | grep QGROUP
You will find there are still items existed.The reasons why this happens
is because the original code just checks slots[0]==0 and returns.
We try to fix it by deleting the leaf one by one.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
David Sterba [Thu, 28 Feb 2013 14:54:18 +0000 (14:54 +0000)]
btrfs: use only inline_pages from extent buffer
The nodesize is capped at 64k and there are enough pages preallocated in
extent_buffer::inline_pages. The fallback to kmalloc never happened
because even on the smallest page size considered (4k) inline_pages
covered the needs.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Miao Xie [Thu, 28 Feb 2013 10:05:36 +0000 (10:05 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix wrong reserved space when deleting a snapshot/subvolume
When deleting a snapshot/subvolume, we need remove root ref/backref,
dir entries and update the dir inode, so we must reserve free space
for those operations.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Miao Xie [Thu, 28 Feb 2013 10:04:33 +0000 (10:04 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix wrong reserved space in qgroup during snap/subv creation
There are two problems in the space reservation of the snapshot/
subvolume creation.
- don't reserve the space for the root item insertion
- the space which is reserved in the qgroup is different with
the free space reservation. we need reserve free space for
7 items, but in qgroup reservation, we need reserve space only
for 3 items.
So we implement new metadata reservation functions for the
snapshot/subvolume creation.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Miao Xie [Thu, 28 Feb 2013 10:01:15 +0000 (10:01 +0000)]
Btrfs: remove unnecessary dget_parent/dput when creating the pending snapshot
Since we have grabbed the parent inode at the beginning of the
snapshot creation, and both sync and async snapshot creation
release it after the pending snapshots are actually created,
it is safe to access the parent inode directly during the snapshot
creation, we needn't use dget_parent/dput to fix the parent dentry
and get the dir inode.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
David Sterba [Wed, 27 Feb 2013 23:13:55 +0000 (23:13 +0000)]
btrfs: remove a printk from scan_one_device
Dave pointed out that he saw messages from btrfs although there was no
such filesystem on his computers. The automatic device scan is called on
every new blockdevice if the usual distro udev rule set is used. The
printk introduced in
6f60cbd3ae442c was a remainder from copying
portions of code from btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb which is used under
different conditions and the warning makes sense there.
Reported-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Liu Bo [Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:28:25 +0000 (13:28 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix NULL pointer after aborting a transaction
While doing cleanup work on an aborted transaction, we've set
the global running transaction pointer to NULL _before_ waiting all
other transaction handles to finish, so others'd hit NULL pointer
crash when referencing the global running transaction pointer.
This first sets a hint to avoid new transaction handle joining, then
waits other existing handles to abort or finish so that we can safely
set the above global pointer to NULL.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Liu Bo [Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:28:24 +0000 (13:28 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix memory leak of log roots
When we abort a transaction while fsyncing, we'll skip freeing log roots
part of committing a transaction, which leads to memory leak.
This adds a 'free log roots' in putting super when no more users hold
references on log roots, so it's safe and clean.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Thu, 28 Feb 2013 18:23:38 +0000 (13:23 -0500)]
Btrfs: copy everything if we've created an inline extent
I noticed while looking into a tree logging bug that we aren't logging inline
extents properly. Since this requires copying and it shouldn't happen too often
just force us to copy everything for the inode into the tree log when we have an
inline extent. With this patch we have valid data after a crash when we write
an inline extent. Thanks,
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Qu Wenruo [Tue, 26 Feb 2013 08:10:22 +0000 (08:10 +0000)]
btrfs: cleanup for open-coded alignment
Though most of the btrfs codes are using ALIGN macro for page alignment,
there are still some codes using open-coded alignment like the
following:
------
u64 mask = ((u64)root->stripesize - 1);
u64 ret = (val + mask) & ~mask;
------
Or even hidden one:
------
num_bytes = (end - start + blocksize) & ~(blocksize - 1);
------
Sometimes these open-coded alignment is not so easy to understand for
newbie like me.
This commit changes the open-coded alignment to the ALIGN macro for a
better readability.
Also there is a previous patch from David Sterba with similar changes,
but the patch is for 3.2 kernel and seems not merged.
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg12747.html
Cc: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Liu Bo [Mon, 25 Feb 2013 04:04:42 +0000 (04:04 +0000)]
Btrfs: do not change inode flags in rename
Before we forced to change a file's NOCOW and COMPRESS flag due to
the parent directory's, but this ends up a bad idea, because it
confuses end users a lot about file's NOCOW status, eg. if someone
change a file to NOCOW via 'chattr' and then rename it in the current
directory which is without NOCOW attribute, the file will lose the
NOCOW flag silently.
This diables 'change flags in rename', so from now on we'll only
inherit flags from the parent directory on creation stage while in
other places we can use 'chattr' to set NOCOW or COMPRESS flags.
Reported-by: Marios Titas <redneb8888@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Liu Bo [Fri, 22 Feb 2013 04:33:36 +0000 (04:33 +0000)]
Btrfs: use reserved space for creating a snapshot
While inserting dir index and updating inode for a snapshot, we'd
add delayed items which consume trans->block_rsv, if we don't have
any space reserved in this trans handle, we either just return or
reserve space again.
But before creating pending snapshots during committing transaction,
we've done a release on this trans handle, so we don't have space reserved
in it at this stage.
What we're using is block_rsv of pending snapshots which has already
reserved well enough space for both inserting dir index and updating
inode, so we need to set trans handle to indicate that we have space
now.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Alexandre Oliva [Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:15:14 +0000 (21:15 +0000)]
clear chunk_alloc flag on retryable failure
I've experienced filesystem freezes with permanent spikes in the active
process count for quite a while, particularly on filesystems whose
available raw space has already been fully allocated to chunks.
While looking into this, I found a pretty obvious error in
do_chunk_alloc: it sets space_info->chunk_alloc, but if
btrfs_alloc_chunk returns an error other than ENOSPC, it returns leaving
that flag set, which causes any other threads waiting for
space_info->chunk_alloc to become zero to spin indefinitely.
I haven't double-checked that this patch fixes the failure I've observed
fully (it's not exactly trivial to trigger), but it surely is a bug and
the fix is trivial, so... Please put it in :-)
What I saw in that function also happens to explain why in some cases I
see filesystems allocate a huge number of chunks that remain unused
(leading to the scenario above, of not having more chunks to allocate).
It happens for data and metadata, but not necessarily both. I'm
guessing some thread sets the force_alloc flag on the corresponding
space_info, and then several threads trying to get disk space end up
attempting to allocate a new chunk concurrently. All of them will see
the force_alloc flag and bump their local copy of force up to the level
they see first, and they won't clear it even if another thread succeeds
in allocating a chunk, thus clearing the force flag. Then each thread
that observed the force flag will, on its turn, force the allocation of
a new chunk. And any threads that come in while it does that will see
the force flag still set and pick it up, and so on. This sounds like a
problem to me, but... what should the correct behavior be? Clear
force_flag once we copy it to a local force? Reset force to the
incoming value on every loop? Set the flag to our incoming force if we
have it at first, clear our local flag, and move it from the space_info
when we determined that we are the thread that's going to perform the
allocation?
btrfs: clear chunk_alloc flag on retryable failure
From: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@gnu.org>
If btrfs_alloc_chunk fails with e.g. ENOMEM, we exit do_chunk_alloc
without clearing chunk_alloc in space_info. As a result, any further
calls to do_chunk_alloc on that filesystem will start busy-waiting for
chunk_alloc to be cleared, but it never will be. This patch adjusts
do_chunk_alloc so that it clears this flag in case of an error.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Jan Schmidt [Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:35:27 +0000 (15:35 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix backref walking race with tree deletions
When a subvolume is removed, we remove the root item from the root tree,
while the tree blocks and backrefs remain for a while. When backref walking
comes across one of those orphan tree blocks, it can find a backref for a
no longer existing root. This is all good, we only must tolerate
__resolve_indirect_ref returning an error and continue with the good refs
found.
Reported-by: Alex Lyakas <alex.btrfs@zadarastorage.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Thu, 21 Feb 2013 20:28:28 +0000 (15:28 -0500)]
Btrfs: make sure NODATACOW also gets NODATASUM set
A user reported hitting the BUG_ON() in btrfs_finished_ordered_io() where we had
csums on a NOCOW extent. This can happen if we have NODATACOW set but not
NODATASUM set, which can happen in two cases, either we mount with -o nodatacow
and then write into preallocated space, or chattr +C a directory and move a file
into that directory. Liu has fixed the move case in a different place, but this
fixes the mount -o nodatacow case. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Miao Xie [Thu, 21 Feb 2013 06:32:52 +0000 (23:32 -0700)]
Btrfs: fix remount vs autodefrag
If we remount the fs to close the auto defragment or make the fs R/O,
we should stop the auto defragment.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Miao Xie [Thu, 21 Feb 2013 09:48:22 +0000 (02:48 -0700)]
Btrfs: fix wrong outstanding_extents when doing DIO write
When running the 083th case of xfstests on the filesystem with
"compress-force=lzo", the following WARNINGs were triggered.
WARNING: at fs/btrfs/inode.c:7908
WARNING: at fs/btrfs/inode.c:7909
WARNING: at fs/btrfs/inode.c:7911
WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4510
WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4511
This problem was introduced by the patch "Btrfs: fix deadlock due
to unsubmitted". In this patch, there are two bugs which caused
the above problem.
The 1st one is a off-by-one bug, if the DIO write return 0, it is
also a short write, we need release the reserved space for it. But
we didn't do it in that patch. Fix it by change "ret > 0" to
"ret >= 0".
The 2nd one is ->outstanding_extents was increased twice when
a short write happened. As we know, ->outstanding_extents is
a counter to keep track of the number of extent items we may
use duo to delalloc, when we reserve the free space for a
delalloc write, we assume that the write will introduce just
one extent item, so we increase ->outstanding_extents by 1 at
that time. And then we will increase it every time we split the
write, it is done at the beginning of btrfs_get_blocks_direct().
So when a short write happens, we needn't increase
->outstanding_extents again. But this patch done.
In order to fix the 2nd problem, I re-write the logic for
->outstanding_extents operation. We don't increase it at the
beginning of btrfs_get_blocks_direct(), instead, we just
increase it when the split actually happens.
Reported-by: Mitch Harder <mitch.harder@sabayonlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Liu Bo [Tue, 29 Jan 2013 03:18:40 +0000 (03:18 +0000)]
Btrfs: snapshot-aware defrag
This comes from one of btrfs's project ideas,
As we defragment files, we break any sharing from other snapshots.
The balancing code will preserve the sharing, and defrag needs to grow this
as well.
Now we're able to fill the blank with this patch, in which we make full use of
backref walking stuff.
Here is the basic idea,
o set the writeback ranges started by defragment with flag EXTENT_DEFRAG
o at endio, after we finish updating fs tree, we use backref walking to find
all parents of the ranges and re-link them with the new COWed file layout by
adding corresponding backrefs.
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Chris Mason [Wed, 20 Feb 2013 21:23:40 +0000 (16:23 -0500)]
Btrfs: fix max chunk size on raid5/6
We try to limit the size of a chunk to 10GB, which keeps the unit of
work reasonable during balance and resize operations. The limit checks
were taking into account the number of copies of the data we had but
what they really should be doing is comparing against the logical
size of the chunk we're creating.
This moves the code around a little to use the count of data stripes
from raid5/6.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Zach Brown [Fri, 16 Nov 2012 00:04:43 +0000 (00:04 +0000)]
btrfs: limit fallocate extent reservation to 256MB
Very large fallocate requests are cpu bound and result in extents with a
repeating pattern of ever decreasing size:
$ time fallocate -l 1T file
real 0m13.039s
( an excerpt of the extents from btrfs-debug-tree: )
prealloc data disk byte
1536292564992 nr 397312
prealloc data disk byte
1536292962304 nr 196608
prealloc data disk byte
1536293158912 nr 98304
prealloc data disk byte
1536293257216 nr 49152
prealloc data disk byte
1536293306368 nr 24576
prealloc data disk byte
1536293330944 nr 12288
prealloc data disk byte
1536293343232 nr 8192
prealloc data disk byte
1536293351424 nr 4096
prealloc data disk byte
1536293355520 nr 4096
prealloc data disk byte
1536293359616 nr 4096
The excessive cpu use comes from __btrfs_prealloc_file_range() trying to
allocate the entire remaining size after each extent is allocated.
btrfs_reserve_extent() repeatedly cuts this requested size in half until
it gets down to the size that the allocators can return. We limit the
problem for now by capping each reservation at 256 meg.
The small extents come from a masking bug when decreasing the requested
reservation size. The high 32bits are cleared and the remaining low
bits might happen to reserve a small size. Fix this by using
round_down() which properly casts the mask.
After these fixes huge fallocate requests are fast and result in nice
large extents:
$ time fallocate -l 1T file
real 0m0.082s
prealloc data disk byte
1112425889792 nr
268435456
prealloc data disk byte
1112694325248 nr
268435456
prealloc data disk byte
1112962760704 nr
268435456
Reported-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Thomas Gleixner [Wed, 20 Feb 2013 19:06:20 +0000 (14:06 -0500)]
btrfs: Init io_lock after cloning btrfs device struct
__btrfs_close_devices() clones btrfs device structs with
memcpy(). Some of the fields in the clone are reinitialized, but it's
missing to init io_lock. In mainline this goes unnoticed, but on RT it
leaves the plist pointing to the original about to be freed lock
struct.
Initialize io_lock after cloning, so no references to the original
struct are left.
Reported-and-tested-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Chris Mason [Wed, 20 Feb 2013 19:06:05 +0000 (14:06 -0500)]
Merge branch 'raid56-experimental' into for-linus-3.9
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Conflicts:
fs/btrfs/ctree.h
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
fs/btrfs/inode.c
fs/btrfs/volumes.c
Chris Mason [Wed, 20 Feb 2013 19:05:45 +0000 (14:05 -0500)]
Merge branch 'master' of git://git./linux/kernel/git/josef/btrfs-next into for-linus-3.9
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Conflicts:
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
Miao Xie [Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:16:39 +0000 (14:16 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix missing release of qgroup reservation in commit_transaction()
We forget to free qgroup reservation in commit_transaction(),fix it.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Wang Shilong [Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:16:14 +0000 (14:16 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix missing check before disabling quota
The original code forget to check whether quota has been disabled firstly,
and it will return 'EINVAL' and return error to users if quota has been
disabled,it will be unfriendly and confusing for users to see that.
So just return directly if quota has been disabled.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Liu Bo [Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:10:23 +0000 (14:10 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix cleaner thread not working with inode cache option
Right now inode cache inode is treated as the same as space cache
inode, ie. keep inode in memory till putting super.
But this leads to an awkward situation.
If we're going to delete a snapshot/subvolume, btrfs will not
actually delete it and return free space, but will add it to dead
roots list until the last inode on this snap/subvol being destroyed.
Then we'll fetch deleted roots and cleanup them via cleaner thread.
So here is the problem, if we enable inode cache option, each
snap/subvol has a cached inode which is used to store inode allcation
information. And this cache inode will be kept in memory, as the above
said. So with inode cache, snap/subvol can only be added into
dead roots list during freeing roots stage in umount, so that we can
ONLY get space back after another remount(we cleanup dead roots on mount).
But the real thing is we'll no more use the snap/subvol if we mark it
deleted, so we can safely iput its cache inode when we delete snap/subvol.
Another thing is that we need to change the rules of droping inode, we
don't keep snap/subvol's cache inode in memory till end so that we can
add snap/subvol into dead roots list in time.
Reported-by: Mitch Harder <mitch.harder@sabayonlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Miao Xie [Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:17:06 +0000 (09:17 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix uncompleted transaction
In some cases, we need commit the current transaction, but don't want
to start a new one if there is no running transaction, so we introduce
the function - btrfs_attach_transaction(), which can catch the current
transaction, and return -ENOENT if there is no running transaction.
But no running transaction doesn't mean the current transction completely,
because we removed the running transaction before it completes. In some
cases, it doesn't matter. But in some special cases, such as freeze fs, we
hope the transaction is fully on disk, it will introduce some bugs, for
example, we may feeze the fs and dump the data in the disk, if the transction
doesn't complete, we would dump inconsistent data. So we need fix the above
problem for those cases.
We fixes this problem by introducing a function:
btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier()
if we hope all the transaction is fully on the disk, even they are not
running, we can use this function.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Miao Xie [Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:16:24 +0000 (09:16 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix the deadlock between the transaction start/attach and commit
Now btrfs_commit_transaction() does this
ret = btrfs_run_ordered_operations(root, 0)
which async flushes all inodes on the ordered operations list, it introduced
a deadlock that transaction-start task, transaction-commit task and the flush
workers waited for each other.
(See the following URL to get the detail
http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=
136070705732646&w=2)
As we know, if ->in_commit is set, it means someone is committing the
current transaction, we should not try to join it if we are not JOIN
or JOIN_NOLOCK, wait is the best choice for it. In this way, we can avoid
the above problem. In this way, there is another benefit: there is no new
transaction handle to block the transaction which is on the way of commit,
once we set ->in_commit.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Miao Xie [Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:13:32 +0000 (09:13 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix the qgroup reserved space is released prematurely
In start_transactio(), we will try to join the transaction again after
the current transaction is committed, so we should not release the
reserved space of the qgroup. Fix it.
Cc: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Zach Brown [Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:55:13 +0000 (00:55 +0000)]
btrfs: define BTRFS_MAGIC as a u64 value
super.magic is an le64 but it's treated as an unterminated string when
compared against BTRFS_MAGIC which is defined as a string. Instead
define BTRFS_MAGIC as a normal hex value and use endian helpers to
compare it to the super's magic.
I tested this by mounting an fs made before the change and made sure
that it didn't introduce sparse errors. This matches a similar cleanup
that is pending in btrfs-progs. David Sterba pointed out that we should
fix the kernel side as well :).
Signed-off-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
jeff.liu [Sat, 5 Jan 2013 02:48:08 +0000 (02:48 +0000)]
Btrfs: set/change the label of a mounted file system
With this new ioctl(2) BTRFS_IOC_SET_FSLABEL, we can set/change the label of a mounted file system.
Signed-off-by: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@inwind.it>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@inwind.it>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
jeff.liu [Sat, 5 Jan 2013 02:48:01 +0000 (02:48 +0000)]
Btrfs: Add a new ioctl to get the label of a mounted file system
Add a new ioctl(2) BTRFS_IOC_GET_FSLABLE, so that we can get the label upon a mounted filesystem.
Signed-off-by: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Cc: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@inwind.it>
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Wed, 13 Feb 2013 16:09:14 +0000 (11:09 -0500)]
Btrfs: place ordered operations on a per transaction list
Miao made the ordered operations stuff run async, which introduced a
deadlock where we could get somebody (sync) racing in and committing the
transaction while a commit was already happening. The new committer would
try and flush ordered operations which would hang waiting for the commit to
finish because it is done asynchronously and no longer inherits the callers
trans handle. To fix this we need to make the ordered operations list a per
transaction list. We can get new inodes added to the ordered operation list
by truncating them and then having another process writing to them, so this
makes it so that anybody trying to add an ordered operation _must_ start a
transaction in order to add itself to the list, which will keep new inodes
from getting added to the ordered operations list after we start committing.
This should fix the deadlock and also keeps us from doing a lot more work
than we need to during commit. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Tue, 12 Feb 2013 19:07:51 +0000 (14:07 -0500)]
Btrfs: relax the block group size limit for bitmaps
Dave pointed out that xfstests 273 will tell you that it failed to load the
space cache for a block group when it remounts. This is because we run out
of space writing out the block group cache. This is ok and is working as it
should, but let's try to be a bit nicer. This happens because the block
group was 100mb, but bitmap entries cover 128mb, so we were only getting
extent entries for this block group, which ended up being too many to fit in
the free space cache. So relax the bitmap size requirements to block groups
that are at least half the size a bitmap will cover or larger, that way we
can still keep the amount of space used in the free space cache low enough
to be able to write it out. With this patch I no longer fail to write out
the free space cache. Thanks,
Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Ilya Dryomov [Tue, 12 Feb 2013 16:28:59 +0000 (16:28 +0000)]
Btrfs: allow for selecting only completely empty chunks
Enhance balance usage filter by making it possible to balance out only
completely empty chunks. Today, usage filter properly acts on values
from 1 to 99 inclusive, usage=100 selects all chunks, and usage=0
selects no chunks. This commit changes the usage=0 case: the new
meaning is to restripe only completely empty chunks and nothing else.
Suggested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Ilya Dryomov [Tue, 12 Feb 2013 16:27:46 +0000 (16:27 +0000)]
Btrfs: eliminate a use-after-free in btrfs_balance()
Commit
5af3e8cc introduced a use-after-free at volumes.c:3139: bctl is freed
above in __cancel_balance() in all cases except for balance pause. Fix this
by moving the offending check a couple statements above, the meaning of the
check is preserved.
Reported-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:33:00 +0000 (11:33 -0500)]
Btrfs: remove unused extent io tree ops V2
Nobody uses these io tree ops anymore so just remove them and clean up the code
a bit. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
David Sterba [Sat, 9 Feb 2013 23:38:06 +0000 (23:38 +0000)]
btrfs: add cancellation points to defrag
The defrag operation can take very long, we want to have a way how to
cancel it. The code checks for a pending signal at safe points in the
defrag loops and returns EAGAIN. This means a user can press ^C after
running 'btrfs fi defrag', woks for both defrag modes, files and root.
Returning from the command was instant in my light tests, but may take
longer depending on the aging factor of the filesystem.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
David Sterba [Fri, 8 Feb 2013 21:28:17 +0000 (21:28 +0000)]
btrfs: put some enospc messages under enospc_debug
The warning in use_block_rsv is not useful for users and may fill
the logs unnecessarily.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Miao Xie [Fri, 8 Feb 2013 07:04:11 +0000 (07:04 +0000)]
Btrfs: implement unlocked dio write
This idea is from ext4. By this patch, we can make the dio write parallel,
and improve the performance. But because we can not update isize without
i_mutex, the unlocked dio write just can be done in front of the EOF.
We needn't worry about the race between dio write and truncate, because the
truncate need wait untill all the dio write end.
And we also needn't worry about the race between dio write and punch hole,
because we have extent lock to protect our operation.
I ran fio to test the performance of this feature.
== Hardware ==
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E7500 @ 2.93GHz
Mem: 2GB
SSD: Intel X25-M 120GB (Test Partition: 60GB)
== config file ==
[global]
ioengine=psync
direct=1
bs=4k
size=32G
runtime=60
directory=/mnt/btrfs/
filename=testfile
group_reporting
thread
[file1]
numjobs=1 # 2 4
rw=randwrite
== result (KBps) ==
write 1 2 4
lock 24936 24738 24726
nolock 24962 30866 32101
== result (iops) ==
write 1 2 4
lock 6234 6184 6181
nolock 6240 7716 8025
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Miao Xie [Fri, 8 Feb 2013 07:01:08 +0000 (07:01 +0000)]
Btrfs: serialize unlocked dio reads with truncate
Currently, we can do unlocked dio reads, but the following race
is possible:
dio_read_task truncate_task
->btrfs_setattr()
->btrfs_direct_IO
->__blockdev_direct_IO
->btrfs_get_block
->btrfs_truncate()
#alloc truncated blocks
#to other inode
->submit_io()
#INFORMATION LEAK
In order to avoid this problem, we must serialize unlocked dio reads with
truncate. There are two approaches:
- use extent lock to protect the extent that we truncate
- use inode_dio_wait() to make sure the truncating task will wait for
the read DIO.
If we use the 1st one, we will meet the endless truncation problem due to
the nonlocked read DIO after we implement the nonlocked write DIO. It is
because we still need invoke inode_dio_wait() avoid the race between write
DIO and truncation. By that time, we have to introduce
btrfs_inode_{block, resume}_nolock_dio()
again. That is we have to implement this patch again, so I choose the 2nd
way to fix the problem.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Miao Xie [Thu, 7 Feb 2013 10:12:07 +0000 (10:12 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix deadlock due to unsubmitted
The deadlock problem happened when running fsstress(a test program in LTP).
Steps to reproduce:
# mkfs.btrfs -b 100M <partition>
# mount <partition> <mnt>
# <Path>/fsstress -p 3 -n
10000000 -d <mnt>
The reason is:
btrfs_direct_IO()
|->do_direct_IO()
|->get_page()
|->get_blocks()
| |->btrfs_delalloc_resereve_space()
| |->btrfs_add_ordered_extent() ------- Add a new ordered extent
|->dio_send_cur_page(page0) -------------- We didn't submit bio here
|->get_page()
|->get_blocks()
|->btrfs_delalloc_resereve_space()
|->flush_space()
|->btrfs_start_ordered_extent()
|->wait_event() ---------- Wait the completion of
the ordered extent that is
mentioned above
But because we didn't submit the bio that is mentioned above, the ordered
extent can not complete, we would wait for its completion forever.
There are two methods which can fix this deadlock problem:
1. submit the bio before we invoke get_blocks()
2. reserve the space before we do dio
Though the 1st is the simplest way, we need modify the code of VFS, and it
is likely to break contiguous requests, and introduce performance regression
for the other filesystems.
So we have to choose the 2nd way.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Thu, 7 Feb 2013 21:27:28 +0000 (16:27 -0500)]
Btrfs: cleanup orphan reservation if truncate fails
I noticed we were getting lots of warnings with xfstest 83 because we have
reservations outstanding. This is because we moved the orphan add outside
of the truncate, but we don't actually cleanup our reservation if something
fails. This fixes the problem and I no longer see warnings. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Thu, 7 Feb 2013 21:06:02 +0000 (16:06 -0500)]
Btrfs: steal from global reserve if we are cleaning up orphans
Sometimes xfstest 83 will fail to remount the scratch device because we've
gotten ourselves so full that we cannot cleanup the orphan items. In this
case check to see if we're doing the orphan cleanup and if we are allow us
to steal our reservation from the global block rsv. With this patch I've
not been able to reproduce the failed mount problem. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Miao Xie [Thu, 7 Feb 2013 06:02:44 +0000 (06:02 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix memory leak of pending_snapshot->inherit
The argument "inherit" of btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_transid() was assigned
to NULL during we created the snapshots, so we didn't free it though we
called kfree() in the caller.
But since we are sure the snapshot creation is done after the function -
btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_transid() - completes, it is safe that we don't
assign the pointer "inherit" to NULL, and just free it in the caller of
btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_transid(). In this way, the code can become more
readable.
Reported-by: Alex Lyakas <alex.btrfs@zadarastorage.com>
Cc: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Miao Xie [Thu, 7 Feb 2013 06:01:35 +0000 (06:01 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix the race between bio and btrfs_stop_workers
open_ctree() need read the metadata to initialize the global information
of btrfs. But it may fail after it submit some bio, and then it will jump
to the error path. Unfortunately, it doesn't check if there are some bios
in flight, and just stop all the worker threads. As a result, when the
submitted bios end, they can not find any worker thread which can deal with
subsequent work, then oops happen.
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/async-thread.c:605!
Fix this problem by invoking invalidate_inode_pages2() before we stop the
worker threads. This function will wait until the bio end because it need
lock the pages which are going to be invalidated, and if a page is under
disk read IO, it must be locked. invalidate_inode_pages2() need wait until
end bio handler to unlocked it.
Reported-and-Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Mark Fasheh [Mon, 4 Feb 2013 20:54:57 +0000 (20:54 +0000)]
btrfs: add "no file data" flag to btrfs send ioctl
This patch adds the flag, BTRFS_SEND_FLAG_NO_FILE_DATA to the btrfs send
ioctl code. When this flag is set, the btrfs send code will never write file
data into the stream (thus also avoiding expensive reads of that data in the
first place). BTRFS_SEND_C_UPDATE_EXTENT commands will be sent (instead of
BTRFS_SEND_C_WRITE) with an offset, length pair indicating the extent in
question.
This patch does not affect the operation of BTRFS_SEND_C_CLONE commands -
they will continue to be sent when a search finds an appropriate extent to
clone from.
Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Liu Bo [Mon, 4 Feb 2013 13:12:18 +0000 (13:12 +0000)]
Btrfs: extend the checksum item as much as possible
For write, we also reserve some space for COW blocks during updating
the checksum tree, and we calculate the number of blocks by checking
if the number of bytes outstanding that are going to need csums needs
one more block for csum.
When we add these checksum into the checksum tree, we use ordered sums
list.
Every ordered sum contains csums for each sector, and we'll first try
to look up an existing csum item,
a) if we don't yet have a proper csum item, then we need to insert one,
b) or if we find one but the csum item is not big enough, then we need
to extend it.
The point is we'll unlock the whole path and then insert or extend.
So others can hack in and update the tree.
Each insert or extend needs update the tree with COW on, and we may need
to insert/extend for many times.
That means what we've reserved for updating checksum tree is NOT enough
indeed.
The case is even more serious with having several write threads at the
same time, it can end up eating our reserved space quickly and starting
eating globle reserve pool instead.
I don't yet come up with a way to calculate the worse case for updating
csum, but extending the checksum item as much as possible can be helpful
in my test.
The idea behind is that it can reduce the times we insert/extend so that
it saves us precious reserved space.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Eric Sandeen [Thu, 31 Jan 2013 18:21:12 +0000 (18:21 +0000)]
btrfs: remove cache only arguments from defrag path
The entry point at the defrag ioctl always sets "cache only" to 0;
the codepaths haven't run for a long time as far as I can
tell. Chris says they're dead code, so remove them.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Wed, 6 Feb 2013 21:55:41 +0000 (16:55 -0500)]
Btrfs: if we aren't committing just end the transaction if we error out
I hit a deadlock where transaction commit was waiting on num_writers to be
0. This happened because somebody came into btrfs_commit_transaction and
noticed we had aborted and it went to cleanup_transaction. This shouldn't
happen because cleanup_transaction is really to fixup a bad commit, it
doesn't do the normal trans handle cleanup things. So if we have an error
just do the normal btrfs_end_transaction dance and return. Once we are in
the actual commit path we can use cleanup_transaction and be good to go.
Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Wed, 6 Feb 2013 21:49:15 +0000 (16:49 -0500)]
Btrfs: handle errors in compression submission path
I noticed we would deadlock if we aborted a transaction while doing
compressed io. This is because we don't unlock our pages if something goes
horribly wrong. To fix this we need to make sure that we call
extent_clear_unlock_delalloc in order to unlock all the pages. If we have
to cow in the async submission thread we need to make sure to unlock our
locked_page as the cow error path will not unlock the locked page as it
depends on the caller to unlock that page. With this patch we no longer
deadlock on the page lock when we have an aborted transaction. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Wed, 6 Feb 2013 18:53:19 +0000 (13:53 -0500)]
Btrfs: rework the overcommit logic to be based on the total size
People have been complaining about random ENOSPC errors that will clear up
after a umount or just a given amount of time. Chris was able to reproduce
this with stress.sh and lots of processes and so was I. Basically the
overcommit stuff would really let us get out of hand, in my tests I saw up
to 30 gigs of outstanding reservations with only 2 gigs total of metadata
space. This usually worked out fine but with so much outstanding
reservation the flushing stuff short circuits to make sure we don't hang
forever flushing when we really need ENOSPC. Plus we allocate chunks in
order to alleviate the pressure, but this doesn't actually help us since we
only use the non-allocated area in our over commit logic.
So instead of basing overcommit on the amount of non-allocated space,
instead just do it based on how much total space we have, and then limit it
to the non-allocated space in case we are short on space to spill over into.
This allows us to have the same performance as well as no longer giving
random ENOSPC. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Fri, 1 Feb 2013 20:57:47 +0000 (15:57 -0500)]
Btrfs: account for orphan inodes properly during cleanup
Dave sent me a panic where we were doing the orphan cleanup and panic'ed
trying to release our reservation from the orphan block rsv. The reason for
this is because our orphan block rsv had been free'd out from underneath us
because the transaction commit found that there were no orphan inodes
according to its count and decided to free it. This is incorrect so make
sure we inc the orphan inodes count so the accounting is all done properly.
This would also cause the warning in the orphan commit code normally if you
had any orphans to cleanup as they would only decrement the orphan count so
you'd get a negative orphan count which could cause problems during runtime.
Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Thu, 31 Jan 2013 19:58:00 +0000 (14:58 -0500)]
Btrfs: unreserve space if our ordered extent fails to work
When a transaction aborts or there's an EIO on an ordered extent or any
error really we will not free up the space we reserved for this ordered
extent. This results in warnings from the block group cache cleanup in the
case of a transaction abort, or leaking space in the case of EIO on an
ordered extent. Fix this up by free'ing the reserved space if we have an
error at all trying to complete an ordered extent. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Thu, 31 Jan 2013 19:30:08 +0000 (14:30 -0500)]
Btrfs: fix how we discard outstanding ordered extents on abort
When we abort we've been just free'ing up all the ordered extents and
hoping for the best. This results in lots of warnings from various places,
warnings from btrfs_destroy_inode() because it's ENOSPC accounting isn't
fixed. It will also screw up lots of pages who have been set private but
never get cleared because the ordered extents are never allowed to be
submitted. This patch fixes those warnings. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Wed, 30 Jan 2013 21:03:59 +0000 (16:03 -0500)]
Btrfs: fix freeing delayed ref head while still holding its mutex
I hit this error when reproducing a bug that would end in a transaction
abort. We take the delayed ref head's mutex to keep anybody from processing
it while we're destroying it, but we fail to drop the mutex before we carry
on and free the damned thing. Fix this by doing the remove logic for the
head ourselves and unlock the mutex, that way we can avoid use after free's
or hung tasks waiting on that mutex to come back so they know the delayed
ref completed. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Eric Sandeen [Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:55:01 +0000 (00:55 +0000)]
btrfs: ensure we don't overrun devices_info[] in __btrfs_alloc_chunk
WARN_ON isn't enough, we need to stop the loop if for any reason
we would overrun the devices_info array.
I tried to track down the connection between the length of
the alloc_devices list and the rw_devices counter but
it wasn't immediately obvious, so be defensive about it.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Eric Sandeen [Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:55:00 +0000 (00:55 +0000)]
btrfs: remove unnecessary DEFINE_WAIT() declarations
No point in DEFINE_WAIT(wait) if it's not used!
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Eric Sandeen [Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:54:59 +0000 (00:54 +0000)]
btrfs: remove unused "item" in btrfs_insert_delayed_item()
"item" was set but never used in this function.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Eric Sandeen [Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:54:58 +0000 (00:54 +0000)]
btrfs: fix varargs in __btrfs_std_error
__btrfs_std_error didn't always properly call va_end,
and might call va_start even if fmt was NULL.
Move all the varargs handling into the block where we
have fmt.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Eric Sandeen [Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:54:57 +0000 (00:54 +0000)]
btrfs: add missing break in btrfs_print_leaf()
I don't think that BTRFS_DEV_EXTENT_KEY is supposed
to fall through to BTRFS_DEV_STATS_KEY ...
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Eric Sandeen [Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:54:56 +0000 (00:54 +0000)]
btrfs: annotate intentional switch case fallthroughs
This keeps static checkers happy.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Eric Sandeen [Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:54:55 +0000 (00:54 +0000)]
btrfs: handle null fs_info in btrfs_panic()
At least backref_tree_panic() can apparently pass
in a null fs_info, so handle that in __btrfs_panic
to get the message out on the console.
The btrfs_panic macro also uses fs_info, but that's
largely pointless; it's testing to see if
BTRFS_MOUNT_PANIC_ON_FATAL_ERROR is not set.
But if it *were* set, __btrfs_panic() would have,
well, paniced and we wouldn't be here, testing it!
So just BUG() at this point.
And since we only use fs_info once now, just use it
directly.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Eric Sandeen [Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:54:54 +0000 (00:54 +0000)]
btrfs: remove unused fs_info from btrfs_decode_error()
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Eric Sandeen [Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:54:53 +0000 (00:54 +0000)]
btrfs: list_entry can't return NULL
No need to test the result, we can't get a
null pointer from list_entry()
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Eric Sandeen [Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:54:52 +0000 (00:54 +0000)]
btrfs: remove unused fd in btrfs_ioctl_send()
All we do is set it to NULL and test it :)
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Wed, 30 Jan 2013 22:02:51 +0000 (17:02 -0500)]
Btrfs: do not overcommit if we don't have enough space for global rsv
Because of how little we allocate chunks now we can get really tight on
metadata space before we will allocate a new chunk. This resulted in being
unable to add device extents when allocating a new metadata chunk as we did
not have enough space. This is because we were allowed to overcommit too
much metadata without actually making sure we had enough space to make
allocations. The idea behind overcommit is that we are allowed to say "sure
you can have that reservation" when most of the free space is occupied by
reservations, not actual allocations. But in this case where a majority of
the total space is in use by actual allocations we can screw ourselves by
not being able to make real allocations when it matters. So make sure we
have enough real space for our global reserve, and if not then don't allow
overcommitting. Thanks,
Reported-and-tested-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Thu, 31 Jan 2013 15:23:04 +0000 (10:23 -0500)]
Btrfs: remove extent mapping if we fail to add chunk
I got a double free error when unmounting a file system that failed to add a
chunk during its operation. This is because we will kfree the mapping that
we created but leave the extent_map in the em_tree for chunks. So to fix
this just remove the extent_map when we error out so we don't run into this
problem. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Tue, 29 Jan 2013 20:03:37 +0000 (15:03 -0500)]
Btrfs: fix chunk allocation error handling
If we error out allocating a dev extent we will have already created the
block group and such which will cause problems since the allocator may have
tried to allocate out of the block group that no longer exists. This will
cause BUG_ON()'s in the bio submission path. This also makes a failure to
allocate a dev extent a non-abort error, we will just clean up the dev
extents we did allocate and exit. Now if we fail to delete the dev extents
we will abort since we can't have half of the dev extents hanging around,
but this will make us much less likely to abort. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Miao Xie [Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:14:48 +0000 (10:14 +0000)]
Btrfs: use bit operation for ->fs_state
There is no lock to protect fs_info->fs_state, it will introduce
some problems, such as the value may be covered by the other task
when several tasks modify it. For example:
Task0 - CPU0 Task1 - CPU1
mov %fs_state rax
or $0x1 rax
mov %fs_state rax
or $0x2 rax
mov rax %fs_state
mov rax %fs_state
The expected value is 3, but in fact, it is 2.
Though this problem doesn't happen now (because there is only one
flag currently), the code is error prone, if we add other flags,
the above problem will happen to a certainty.
Now we use bit operation for it to fix the above problem.
In this way, we can make the code more robust and be easy to
add new flags.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Miao Xie [Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:13:12 +0000 (10:13 +0000)]
Btrfs: use seqlock to protect fs_info->avail_{data, metadata, system}_alloc_bits
There is no lock to protect
fs_info->avail_{data, metadata, system}_alloc_bits,
it may introduce some problem, such as the wrong profile
information, so we add a seqlock to protect them.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Miao Xie [Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:11:59 +0000 (10:11 +0000)]
Btrfs: use the inode own lock to protect its delalloc_bytes
We need not use a global lock to protect the delalloc_bytes of the
inode, just use its own lock. In this way, we can reduce the lock
contention and ->delalloc_lock will just protect delalloc inode
list.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>