GitHub/LineageOS/android_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git
11 years agocpufreq: remove CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:59:08 +0000 (20:29 +0530)]
cpufreq: remove CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE

CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE will be always enabled when cpufreq framework is used, as
cpufreq core depends on it. So, we don't need this CONFIG option anymore as it
is not configurable. Remove CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE and update its users.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: create cpufreq_generic_init() routine
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:59:07 +0000 (20:29 +0530)]
cpufreq: create cpufreq_generic_init() routine

Many CPUFreq drivers for SMP system (where all cores share same clock lines), do
similar stuff in their ->init() part.

This patch creates a generic routine in cpufreq core which can be used by these
so that we can remove some redundant code.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: unicore2: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:59:06 +0000 (20:29 +0530)]
cpufreq: unicore2: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: tegra: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:59:05 +0000 (20:29 +0530)]
cpufreq: tegra: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: speedstep: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:59:04 +0000 (20:29 +0530)]
cpufreq: speedstep: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: spear: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:59:03 +0000 (20:29 +0530)]
cpufreq: spear: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: sh: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:59:02 +0000 (20:29 +0530)]
cpufreq: sh: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: sc520_freq: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:59:01 +0000 (20:29 +0530)]
cpufreq: sc520_freq: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: sa11x0: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:59:00 +0000 (20:29 +0530)]
cpufreq: sa11x0: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: s5pv210: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:59 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: s5pv210: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: s3c: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:58 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: s3c: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: pxa: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:57 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: pxa: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Cc: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: ppc: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:56 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: ppc: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: powernow: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:55 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: powernow: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: pmac: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:54 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: pmac: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: pcc: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:53 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: pcc: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: p4: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:52 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: p4: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: omap: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:51 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: omap: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: maple: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:50 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: maple: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: loongson2: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:49 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: loongson2: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Cc: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: longhaul: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:48 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: longhaul: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: kirkwood: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:47 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: kirkwood: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: integrator: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:46 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: integrator: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init(). And so we don't need to set policy->cur from driver anymore.

Over that it sets policy->min and max correctly. They were earlier set to
current frequency of CPU but they should be set to max and min freq of cpu.

Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: imx6q: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:45 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: imx6q: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: ia64-acpi: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:44 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: ia64-acpi: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: gx: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:43 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: gx: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: exynos: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:42 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: exynos: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-By: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: elanfreq: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:41 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: elanfreq: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: e_powersaver: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:40 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: e_powersaver: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: dbx500: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:39 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: dbx500: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: davinci: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:38 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: davinci: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: cris: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:37 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: cris: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: nforce2: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:36 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: nforce2: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: cpu0: don't initialize part of policy set by core too
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:35 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: cpu0: don't initialize part of policy set by core too

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: blackfin: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:34 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: blackfin: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Cc: Steven Miao <realmz6@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: at32ap: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:33 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: at32ap: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: arm_big_little: don't initialize part of policy is set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:32 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: arm_big_little: don't initialize part of policy is set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:31 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: don't initialize part of policy set by core

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: call cpufreq_driver->get() after calling ->init()
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:30 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: call cpufreq_driver->get() after calling ->init()

Almost all drivers set policy->cur with current CPU frequency in their ->init()
part. This can be done for all of them at core level and so they wouldn't need
to do it.

This patch adds supporting code in cpufreq core for calling get() after we have
called init() for a policy.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: tegra: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:29 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: tegra: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the Tegra driver.

Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: speedstep: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:28 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: speedstep: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the speedstep driver.

Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: spear: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:27 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: spear: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the spear driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: sparc: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:26 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: sparc: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the sparc driver.

Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: sh: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:25 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: sh: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the sh driver.

Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: sc520: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:24 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: sc520: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the sc520 driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: sa11x0: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:23 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: sa11x0: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the sa11x0 driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: s5pv210: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:22 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: s5pv210: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the s5pv210 driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: s3cx4xx: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:21 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: s3cx4xx: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the s3cx4xx driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: pxa: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:20 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: pxa: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the PXA driver.

Cc: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: ppc_cbe: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:19 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: ppc_cbe: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the ppc_cbe driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: ppc-corenet: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:18 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: ppc-corenet: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the ppc-corenet driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: powernow: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:17 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: powernow: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the powernow driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: pmac: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:16 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: pmac: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the pmac driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: pasemi: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:15 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: pasemi: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the pasemi driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: p4-clockmod: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:14 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: p4-clockmod: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the p4-clockmod driver.

Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: omap: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:13 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: omap: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the OMAP driver.

Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: maple: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:12 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: maple: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the maple driver.

Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: loongson2: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:11 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: loongson2: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the loongson2 driver.

Cc: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: longhaul: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:10 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: longhaul: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the longhaul driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: kirkwood: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:09 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: kirkwood: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the kirkwood driver.

Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: imx6q: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:08 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: imx6q: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines for in the imx6q driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: ia64-acpi: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:07 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: ia64-acpi: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the ia64-acpi driver.

Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: exynos: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:06 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: exynos: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the exynos driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-By: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: elanfreq: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:05 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: elanfreq: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the elanfreq driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: e_powersaver: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:04 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: e_powersaver: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the e_powersaver driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: dbx500: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:03 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: dbx500: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines for in the dbx500 driver.

Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: davinci: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:02 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: davinci: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the davinci driver.

Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: cris: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:01 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: cris: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the cris driver.

Cc: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:58:00 +0000 (20:28 +0530)]
cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the cpufreq-cpu0 driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: blackfin: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:57:59 +0000 (20:27 +0530)]
cpufreq: blackfin: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the blackfin driver.

Cc: Steven Miao <realmz6@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: at32ap: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:57:58 +0000 (20:27 +0530)]
cpufreq: at32ap: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the at32ap driver.

Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: arm_big_little: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:57:57 +0000 (20:27 +0530)]
cpufreq: arm_big_little: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the arm_big_little driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: acpi: Use generic cpufreq routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:57:56 +0000 (20:27 +0530)]
cpufreq: acpi: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses the generic verify routine in the ACPI driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: define generic .attr, .exit() and .verify() routines
Viresh Kumar [Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:57:55 +0000 (20:27 +0530)]
cpufreq: define generic .attr, .exit() and .verify() routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch introduces generic .attr, .exit() and .verify() cpufreq drivers.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: add new routine cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits()
Viresh Kumar [Wed, 2 Oct 2013 08:43:19 +0000 (14:13 +0530)]
cpufreq: add new routine cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits()

Most of the users of cpufreq_verify_within_limits() calls it for
limiting with min/max from policy->cpuinfo. We can make that code
simple by introducing another routine which will do this for them
automatically.

This patch adds another routine cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits()
and updates others to use it.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: use cpufreq_driver->flags to mark CPUFREQ_HAVE_GOVERNOR_PER_POLICY
Viresh Kumar [Wed, 2 Oct 2013 08:43:18 +0000 (14:13 +0530)]
cpufreq: use cpufreq_driver->flags to mark CPUFREQ_HAVE_GOVERNOR_PER_POLICY

Use cpufreq_driver->flags to mark CPUFREQ_HAVE_GOVERNOR_PER_POLICY instead
of a separate field within cpufreq_driver. This will save some bytes of
memory.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: rewrite cpufreq_driver->flags using shift operator
Viresh Kumar [Wed, 2 Oct 2013 08:43:17 +0000 (14:13 +0530)]
cpufreq: rewrite cpufreq_driver->flags using shift operator

Currently cpufreq_driver's flags are defined directly using 0x1, 0x2, 0x4, 0x8,
etc.. As the list grows it becomes less readable..

Use bitwise shift operator << to generate these numbers for respective
positions.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: rename __cpufreq_set_policy() as cpufreq_set_policy()
Viresh Kumar [Wed, 2 Oct 2013 08:43:16 +0000 (14:13 +0530)]
cpufreq: rename __cpufreq_set_policy() as cpufreq_set_policy()

Earlier there used to be two functions named __cpufreq_set_policy() and
cpufreq_set_policy(), but now we only have a single routine lets name it
cpufreq_set_policy() instead of __cpufreq_set_policy().

This also removes some invalid comments or fixes some incorrect comments.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: Optimize cpufreq_frequency_table_verify()
Viresh Kumar [Wed, 2 Oct 2013 08:43:15 +0000 (14:13 +0530)]
cpufreq: Optimize cpufreq_frequency_table_verify()

cpufreq_frequency_table_verify() is rewritten here to make it more logical
and efficient.
 - merge multiple lines for variable declarations together.
 - quit early if any frequency between min/max is found.
 - don't call cpufreq_verify_within_limits() in case any valid freq is
   found as it is of no use.
 - rename the count variable as found and change its type to boolean.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: remove __cpufreq_remove_dev()
Viresh Kumar [Wed, 2 Oct 2013 08:43:14 +0000 (14:13 +0530)]
cpufreq: remove __cpufreq_remove_dev()

Nobody except cpufreq_remove_dev() calls __cpufreq_remove_dev() and
so we don't need two separate routines here. Merge code from
__cpufreq_remove_dev() into cpufreq_remove_dev() and get rid of
__cpufreq_remove_dev().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: don't break string in print statements
Viresh Kumar [Wed, 2 Oct 2013 08:43:13 +0000 (14:13 +0530)]
cpufreq: don't break string in print statements

As a rule its better not to break string (quoted inside "") in a
print statement even if it crosses 80 column boundary as that may
introduce bugs and so this patch rewrites one of the print statements..

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: Remove extra blank line
Viresh Kumar [Wed, 2 Oct 2013 08:43:12 +0000 (14:13 +0530)]
cpufreq: Remove extra blank line

We don't need a blank line just at start of a block, lets remove it.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: remove invalid comment from __cpufreq_remove_dev()
Viresh Kumar [Wed, 2 Oct 2013 08:43:11 +0000 (14:13 +0530)]
cpufreq: remove invalid comment from __cpufreq_remove_dev()

Some section of kerneldoc comment for __cpufreq_remove_dev() is invalid now.
Remove it.

Suggested-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: make return type of lock_policy_rwsem_{read|write}() as void
Viresh Kumar [Wed, 2 Oct 2013 08:43:09 +0000 (14:13 +0530)]
cpufreq: make return type of lock_policy_rwsem_{read|write}() as void

lock_policy_rwsem_{read|write}() currently has return type of int,
but it always returns zero and hence its return type should be void
instead. This patch makes that change and modifies all of the users
accordingly.

Reported-by: Jon Medhurst<tixy@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: omap: call cpufreq_frequency_table_put_attr()
Viresh Kumar [Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:26:46 +0000 (18:56 +0530)]
cpufreq: omap: call cpufreq_frequency_table_put_attr()

Drivers which have an exit path must call cpufreq_frequency_table_put_attr() if
they have called cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr() in their init path.

This driver was missing this part and is fixed with this patch.

Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: loongson2: call cpufreq_frequency_table_put_attr()
Viresh Kumar [Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:26:45 +0000 (18:56 +0530)]
cpufreq: loongson2: call cpufreq_frequency_table_put_attr()

Drivers which have an exit path must call cpufreq_frequency_table_put_attr() if
they have called cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr() in their init path.

This driver was missing this part and is fixed with this patch.

Cc: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: exynos: call cpufreq_frequency_table_put_attr()
Viresh Kumar [Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:26:44 +0000 (18:56 +0530)]
cpufreq: exynos: call cpufreq_frequency_table_put_attr()

Drivers which have an exit path must call cpufreq_frequency_table_put_attr() if
they have called cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr() in their init path.

This driver was missing this part and is fixed with this patch.

Acked-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: blackfin: call cpufreq_frequency_table_put_attr()
Viresh Kumar [Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:26:43 +0000 (18:56 +0530)]
cpufreq: blackfin: call cpufreq_frequency_table_put_attr()

Drivers which have an exit path must call cpufreq_frequency_table_put_attr() if
they have called cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr() in their init path.

This driver was missing this part and is fixed with this patch.

Cc: Steven Miao <realmz6@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: arm_big_little: call cpufreq_frequency_table_put_attr()
Viresh Kumar [Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:26:42 +0000 (18:56 +0530)]
cpufreq: arm_big_little: call cpufreq_frequency_table_put_attr()

Drivers which have an exit path must call cpufreq_frequency_table_put_attr() if
they have called cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr() in their init path.

This driver was missing this part and is fixed with this patch.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: at32ap: add frequency table
Hans-Christian Egtvedt [Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:26:41 +0000 (18:56 +0530)]
cpufreq: at32ap: add frequency table

This patch adds a dynamically calculated frequency table to the at32ap driver.
In short the architecture can scale in power of two between a maximum and
minimum frequency. Min, max, and the steps in between are added to the table.

Signed-off-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: tegra: fix implementation of ->exit()
Viresh Kumar [Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:26:40 +0000 (18:56 +0530)]
cpufreq: tegra: fix implementation of ->exit()

->exit() of drivers should call cpufreq_frequency_table_put_attr() if they have
called cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr() earlier in init() and they aren't
required to validate their cpufreq table in exit by calling
cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(). Tegra's driver wasn't calling
cpufreq_frequency_table_put_attr() and was calling
cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() in exit.

Fix both these issues in it.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: tegra: use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show()
Viresh Kumar [Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:26:39 +0000 (18:56 +0530)]
cpufreq: tegra: use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show()

Lets use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() instead of calling
cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() and cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr().

Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: speedstep: use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show()
Viresh Kumar [Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:26:38 +0000 (18:56 +0530)]
cpufreq: speedstep: use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show()

Lets use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() instead of calling
cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() and cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr().

Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: spear: use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show()
Viresh Kumar [Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:26:37 +0000 (18:56 +0530)]
cpufreq: spear: use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show()

Lets use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() instead of calling
cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() and cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: sparc: use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show()
Viresh Kumar [Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:26:36 +0000 (18:56 +0530)]
cpufreq: sparc: use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show()

Lets use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() instead of calling
cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() and cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr().

Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: sh: use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show()
Viresh Kumar [Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:26:35 +0000 (18:56 +0530)]
cpufreq: sh: use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show()

Lets use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() instead of calling
cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() and cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr().

Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: sc520: use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show()
Viresh Kumar [Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:26:34 +0000 (18:56 +0530)]
cpufreq: sc520: use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show()

Lets use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() instead of calling
cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() and cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: sa11x0: let cpufreq core initialize struct policy fields
Viresh Kumar [Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:26:33 +0000 (18:56 +0530)]
cpufreq: sa11x0: let cpufreq core initialize struct policy fields

Many fields of struct policy are filled by cpufreq core when we call
cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() and so cpufreq driver doesn't need to set them
anymore.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: sa11x0: Expose frequency table
Viresh Kumar [Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:26:32 +0000 (18:56 +0530)]
cpufreq: sa11x0: Expose frequency table

This patch exposes sa11x0's frequency table to cpufreq core. It always existed
but not as an array frequencies and not in the format cpufreq core wants it to.
Also it was present in the unit of 100kHz earlier which is made consistent with
cpufreq core now, i.e. kHz.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
11 years agocpufreq: s5pv210: use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show()
Viresh Kumar [Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:26:31 +0000 (18:56 +0530)]
cpufreq: s5pv210: use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show()

Lets use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() instead of calling
cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() and cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr().

Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>