From: Vivien Didelot Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 21:00:36 +0000 (-0400) Subject: net: dsa: change scope of STP state setter X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=fd364541319749c9880bf3ad613eac80fc6ea91e;p=GitHub%2FLineageOS%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git net: dsa: change scope of STP state setter Instead of having multiple STP state helpers scoping a slave device supporting both the DSA logic and the switchdev binding, provide a single dsa_port_set_state helper scoping a DSA port, as well as its dsa_port_set_state_now wrapper which skips the prepare phase. This allows us to better separate the DSA logic from the slave device handling. Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- diff --git a/net/dsa/slave.c b/net/dsa/slave.c index 91236d602301..403d1dfe7f50 100644 --- a/net/dsa/slave.c +++ b/net/dsa/slave.c @@ -85,13 +85,15 @@ static inline bool dsa_port_is_bridged(struct dsa_port *dp) return !!dp->bridge_dev; } -static void dsa_slave_set_state(struct net_device *dev, u8 state) +static int dsa_port_set_state(struct dsa_port *dp, u8 state, + struct switchdev_trans *trans) { - struct dsa_slave_priv *p = netdev_priv(dev); - struct dsa_port *dp = p->dp; struct dsa_switch *ds = dp->ds; int port = dp->index; + if (switchdev_trans_ph_prepare(trans)) + return ds->ops->port_stp_state_set ? 0 : -EOPNOTSUPP; + if (ds->ops->port_stp_state_set) ds->ops->port_stp_state_set(ds, port, state); @@ -110,6 +112,17 @@ static void dsa_slave_set_state(struct net_device *dev, u8 state) } dp->stp_state = state; + + return 0; +} + +static void dsa_port_set_state_now(struct dsa_port *dp, u8 state) +{ + int err; + + err = dsa_port_set_state(dp, state, NULL); + if (err) + pr_err("DSA: failed to set STP state %u (%d)\n", state, err); } static int dsa_slave_open(struct net_device *dev) @@ -147,7 +160,7 @@ static int dsa_slave_open(struct net_device *dev) goto clear_promisc; } - dsa_slave_set_state(dev, stp_state); + dsa_port_set_state_now(p->dp, stp_state); if (p->phy) phy_start(p->phy); @@ -189,7 +202,7 @@ static int dsa_slave_close(struct net_device *dev) if (ds->ops->port_disable) ds->ops->port_disable(ds, p->dp->index, p->phy); - dsa_slave_set_state(dev, BR_STATE_DISABLED); + dsa_port_set_state_now(p->dp, BR_STATE_DISABLED); return 0; } @@ -386,21 +399,6 @@ static int dsa_slave_ioctl(struct net_device *dev, struct ifreq *ifr, int cmd) return -EOPNOTSUPP; } -static int dsa_slave_stp_state_set(struct net_device *dev, - const struct switchdev_attr *attr, - struct switchdev_trans *trans) -{ - struct dsa_slave_priv *p = netdev_priv(dev); - struct dsa_switch *ds = p->dp->ds; - - if (switchdev_trans_ph_prepare(trans)) - return ds->ops->port_stp_state_set ? 0 : -EOPNOTSUPP; - - dsa_slave_set_state(dev, attr->u.stp_state); - - return 0; -} - static int dsa_slave_vlan_filtering(struct net_device *dev, const struct switchdev_attr *attr, struct switchdev_trans *trans) @@ -465,11 +463,13 @@ static int dsa_slave_port_attr_set(struct net_device *dev, const struct switchdev_attr *attr, struct switchdev_trans *trans) { + struct dsa_slave_priv *p = netdev_priv(dev); + struct dsa_port *dp = p->dp; int ret; switch (attr->id) { case SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_STP_STATE: - ret = dsa_slave_stp_state_set(dev, attr, trans); + ret = dsa_port_set_state(dp, attr->u.stp_state, trans); break; case SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING: ret = dsa_slave_vlan_filtering(dev, attr, trans); @@ -621,7 +621,7 @@ static void dsa_slave_bridge_port_leave(struct net_device *dev, /* Port left the bridge, put in BR_STATE_DISABLED by the bridge layer, * so allow it to be in BR_STATE_FORWARDING to be kept functional */ - dsa_slave_set_state(dev, BR_STATE_FORWARDING); + dsa_port_set_state_now(p->dp, BR_STATE_FORWARDING); } static int dsa_slave_port_attr_get(struct net_device *dev,