From: Yinghai Lu Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 18:49:10 +0000 (-0700) Subject: x86, range: fix missing merge during add range X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=fbe06b7bae7c9cf6ab05168fce5ee93b2f4bae7c;p=GitHub%2Fmoto-9609%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git x86, range: fix missing merge during add range Christian found v3.9 does not work with E350 with EFI is enabled. [ 1.658832] Trying to unpack rootfs image as initramfs... [ 1.679935] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffff88006e3fd000 [ 1.686940] IP: [] memset+0x1f/0xb0 [ 1.692010] PGD 1f77067 PUD 1f7a067 PMD 61420067 PTE 0 but early memtest report all memory could be accessed without problem. early page table is set in following sequence: [ 0.000000] init_memory_mapping: [mem 0x00000000-0x000fffff] [ 0.000000] init_memory_mapping: [mem 0x6e600000-0x6e7fffff] [ 0.000000] init_memory_mapping: [mem 0x6c000000-0x6e5fffff] [ 0.000000] init_memory_mapping: [mem 0x00100000-0x6bffffff] [ 0.000000] init_memory_mapping: [mem 0x6e800000-0x6ea07fff] but later efi_enter_virtual_mode try set mapping again wrongly. [ 0.010644] pid_max: default: 32768 minimum: 301 [ 0.015302] init_memory_mapping: [mem 0x640c5000-0x6e3fcfff] that means it fails with pfn_range_is_mapped. It turns out that we have a bug in add_range_with_merge and it does not merge range properly when new add one fill the hole between two exsiting ranges. In the case when [mem 0x00100000-0x6bffffff] is the hole between [mem 0x00000000-0x000fffff] and [mem 0x6c000000-0x6e7fffff]. Fix the add_range_with_merge by calling itself recursively. Reported-by: "Christian König" Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAE9FiQVofGoSk7q5-0irjkBxemqK729cND4hov-1QCBJDhxpgQ@mail.gmail.com Cc: v3.9 Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin --- diff --git a/kernel/range.c b/kernel/range.c index 071b0ab455cb..eb911dbce267 100644 --- a/kernel/range.c +++ b/kernel/range.c @@ -48,9 +48,11 @@ int add_range_with_merge(struct range *range, int az, int nr_range, final_start = min(range[i].start, start); final_end = max(range[i].end, end); - range[i].start = final_start; - range[i].end = final_end; - return nr_range; + /* clear it and add it back for further merge */ + range[i].start = 0; + range[i].end = 0; + return add_range_with_merge(range, az, nr_range, + final_start, final_end); } /* Need to add it: */