From: Luis R. Rodriguez Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 00:04:40 +0000 (-0700) Subject: x86/cpu/intel: Remove not needed paravirt_enabled() use for F00F work around X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=fa392794ed8329379f3f637da7c3c2f078309a77;p=GitHub%2Fmoto-9609%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git x86/cpu/intel: Remove not needed paravirt_enabled() use for F00F work around The X86_BUG_F00F work around is responsible for fixing up the error generated on attempted F00F exploitation from an OOPS to a SIGILL. There is no reason why this code should not be allowed to run on PV guest on a F00F-affected CPU -- it would simply never trigger. The pv_enabled() check was there only to avoid printing the f00f workaround, so removing the check is purely a cosmetic change. Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: Brian Gerst Cc: Denys Vlasenko Cc: H. Peter Anvin Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: andrew.cooper3@citrix.com Cc: andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com Cc: bigeasy@linutronix.de Cc: boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com Cc: david.vrabel@citrix.com Cc: ffainelli@freebox.fr Cc: george.dunlap@citrix.com Cc: glin@suse.com Cc: jgross@suse.com Cc: jlee@suse.com Cc: josh@joshtriplett.org Cc: julien.grall@linaro.org Cc: konrad.wilk@oracle.com Cc: kozerkov@parallels.com Cc: lenb@kernel.org Cc: lguest@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Cc: lv.zheng@intel.com Cc: matt@codeblueprint.co.uk Cc: mbizon@freebox.fr Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: robert.moore@intel.com Cc: rusty@rustcorp.com.au Cc: tiwai@suse.de Cc: toshi.kani@hp.com Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1460592286-300-11-git-send-email-mcgrof@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c index 1f7fdb91a818..016b3d9ffa7d 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c @@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ static void intel_workarounds(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) * The Quark is also family 5, but does not have the same bug. */ clear_cpu_bug(c, X86_BUG_F00F); - if (!paravirt_enabled() && c->x86 == 5 && c->x86_model < 9) { + if (c->x86 == 5 && c->x86_model < 9) { static int f00f_workaround_enabled; set_cpu_bug(c, X86_BUG_F00F);