From: Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 22:18:15 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: dm: dec_pending needs locking to save error value
X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=f88fb981183e71daf40bbd84bc8251bbf7b59e19;p=GitHub%2Fmoto-9609%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git

dm: dec_pending needs locking to save error value

Multiple instances of dec_pending() can run concurrently so a lock is
needed when it saves the first error code.

I have never experienced actual problem without locking and just found
this during code inspection while implementing the barrier support
patch for request-based dm.

This patch adds the locking.
I've done compile, boot and basic I/O testings.

Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com>
Signed-off-by: Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>
Signed-off-by: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
---

diff --git a/drivers/md/dm.c b/drivers/md/dm.c
index c5f9918dab24..724efc63904d 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm.c
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ struct dm_io {
 	atomic_t io_count;
 	struct bio *bio;
 	unsigned long start_time;
+	spinlock_t endio_lock;
 };
 
 /*
@@ -578,8 +579,12 @@ static void dec_pending(struct dm_io *io, int error)
 	struct mapped_device *md = io->md;
 
 	/* Push-back supersedes any I/O errors */
-	if (error && !(io->error > 0 && __noflush_suspending(md)))
-		io->error = error;
+	if (unlikely(error)) {
+		spin_lock_irqsave(&io->endio_lock, flags);
+		if (!(io->error > 0 && __noflush_suspending(md)))
+			io->error = error;
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&io->endio_lock, flags);
+	}
 
 	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&io->io_count)) {
 		if (io->error == DM_ENDIO_REQUEUE) {
@@ -1226,6 +1231,7 @@ static void __split_and_process_bio(struct mapped_device *md, struct bio *bio)
 	atomic_set(&ci.io->io_count, 1);
 	ci.io->bio = bio;
 	ci.io->md = md;
+	spin_lock_init(&ci.io->endio_lock);
 	ci.sector = bio->bi_sector;
 	ci.sector_count = bio_sectors(bio);
 	if (unlikely(bio_empty_barrier(bio)))