From: Paul Mackerras Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 06:46:03 +0000 (+1100) Subject: KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Refine barriers in guest entry/exit X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=f019b7ad76e6bdbc8462cbe17ad5b86a25fcdf24;p=GitHub%2FLineageOS%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Refine barriers in guest entry/exit Some users have reported instances of the host hanging with secondary threads of a core waiting for the primary thread to exit the guest, and the primary thread stuck in nap mode. This prompted a review of the memory barriers in the guest entry/exit code, and this is the result. Most of these changes are the suggestions of Dean Burdick . The barriers between updating napping_threads and reading the entry_exit_count on the one hand, and updating entry_exit_count and reading napping_threads on the other, need to be isync not lwsync, since we need to ensure that either the napping_threads update or the entry_exit_count update get seen. It is not sufficient to order the load vs. lwarx, as lwsync does; we need to order the load vs. the stwcx., so we need isync. In addition, we need a full sync before sending IPIs to wake other threads from nap, to ensure that the write to the entry_exit_count is visible before the IPI occurs. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf --- diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S index bc8de75b1925..bde28da69610 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S @@ -153,7 +153,6 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_206) 13: b machine_check_fwnmi - /* * We come in here when wakened from nap mode on a secondary hw thread. * Relocation is off and most register values are lost. @@ -224,6 +223,11 @@ kvm_start_guest: /* Clear our vcpu pointer so we don't come back in early */ li r0, 0 std r0, HSTATE_KVM_VCPU(r13) + /* + * Make sure we clear HSTATE_KVM_VCPU(r13) before incrementing + * the nap_count, because once the increment to nap_count is + * visible we could be given another vcpu. + */ lwsync /* Clear any pending IPI - we're an offline thread */ ld r5, HSTATE_XICS_PHYS(r13) @@ -241,7 +245,6 @@ kvm_start_guest: /* increment the nap count and then go to nap mode */ ld r4, HSTATE_KVM_VCORE(r13) addi r4, r4, VCORE_NAP_COUNT - lwsync /* make previous updates visible */ 51: lwarx r3, 0, r4 addi r3, r3, 1 stwcx. r3, 0, r4 @@ -990,14 +993,13 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_201) */ /* Increment the threads-exiting-guest count in the 0xff00 bits of vcore->entry_exit_count */ - lwsync ld r5,HSTATE_KVM_VCORE(r13) addi r6,r5,VCORE_ENTRY_EXIT 41: lwarx r3,0,r6 addi r0,r3,0x100 stwcx. r0,0,r6 bne 41b - lwsync + isync /* order stwcx. vs. reading napping_threads */ /* * At this point we have an interrupt that we have to pass @@ -1030,6 +1032,8 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_201) sld r0,r0,r4 andc. r3,r3,r0 /* no sense IPI'ing ourselves */ beq 43f + /* Order entry/exit update vs. IPIs */ + sync mulli r4,r4,PACA_SIZE /* get paca for thread 0 */ subf r6,r4,r13 42: andi. r0,r3,1 @@ -1638,10 +1642,10 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFCLR(CPU_FTR_ARCH_206) bge kvm_cede_exit stwcx. r4,0,r6 bne 31b + /* order napping_threads update vs testing entry_exit_count */ + isync li r0,1 stb r0,HSTATE_NAPPING(r13) - /* order napping_threads update vs testing entry_exit_count */ - lwsync mr r4,r3 lwz r7,VCORE_ENTRY_EXIT(r5) cmpwi r7,0x100