From: Trond Myklebust Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 23:19:28 +0000 (-0400) Subject: NFS: Fix another OPEN_DOWNGRADE bug X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=e547f2628327fec6afd2e03b46f113f614cca05b;p=GitHub%2Fmoto-9609%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git NFS: Fix another OPEN_DOWNGRADE bug Olga Kornievskaia reports that the following test fails to trigger an OPEN_DOWNGRADE on the wire, and only triggers the final CLOSE. fd0 = open(foo, RDRW) -- should be open on the wire for "both" fd1 = open(foo, RDONLY) -- should be open on the wire for "read" close(fd0) -- should trigger an open_downgrade read(fd1) close(fd1) The issue is that we're missing a check for whether or not the current state transitioned from an O_RDWR state as opposed to having transitioned from a combination of O_RDONLY and O_WRONLY. Reported-by: Olga Kornievskaia Fixes: cd9288ffaea4 ("NFSv4: Fix another bug in the close/open_downgrade code") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 2.6.33+ Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker --- diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c index 406dd3eb68e2..ff416d0e24bc 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c @@ -2882,12 +2882,11 @@ static void nfs4_close_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, void *data) call_close |= is_wronly; else if (is_wronly) calldata->arg.fmode |= FMODE_WRITE; + if (calldata->arg.fmode != (FMODE_READ|FMODE_WRITE)) + call_close |= is_rdwr; } else if (is_rdwr) calldata->arg.fmode |= FMODE_READ|FMODE_WRITE; - if (calldata->arg.fmode == 0) - call_close |= is_rdwr; - if (!nfs4_valid_open_stateid(state)) call_close = 0; spin_unlock(&state->owner->so_lock);