From: Florian Westphal Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 13:17:55 +0000 (+0200) Subject: xfrm: policy: use atomic_inc_not_zero in rcu section X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=e37cc8ade5afaf082f804c6d18eb23377146bec4;p=GitHub%2Fmoto-9609%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git xfrm: policy: use atomic_inc_not_zero in rcu section If we don't hold the policy lock anymore the refcnt might already be 0, i.e. policy struct is about to be free'd. Switch to atomic_inc_not_zero to avoid this. On removal policies are already unlinked from the tables (lists) before the last _put occurs so we are not supposed to find the same 'dead' entry on the next loop, so its safe to just repeat the lookup. Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert --- diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c index 576d90321068..09f2e2b38246 100644 --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c @@ -60,6 +60,11 @@ static void __xfrm_policy_link(struct xfrm_policy *pol, int dir); static struct xfrm_policy *__xfrm_policy_unlink(struct xfrm_policy *pol, int dir); +static inline bool xfrm_pol_hold_rcu(struct xfrm_policy *policy) +{ + return atomic_inc_not_zero(&policy->refcnt); +} + static inline bool __xfrm4_selector_match(const struct xfrm_selector *sel, const struct flowi *fl) { @@ -1164,7 +1169,8 @@ static struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_policy_lookup_bytype(struct net *net, u8 type, if (read_seqcount_retry(&xfrm_policy_hash_generation, sequence)) goto retry; - xfrm_pol_hold(ret); + if (ret && !xfrm_pol_hold_rcu(ret)) + goto retry; fail: read_unlock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);