From: Ian McDonald Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:42:45 +0000 (-0200) Subject: [DCCP]: Update Documentation X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=ddfe10b82455a5a524055fc606d1f1562d388dc8;p=GitHub%2FLineageOS%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git [DCCP]: Update Documentation This patch just updates DCCP documentation a bit. Signed-off-by: Ian McDonald Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo --- diff --git a/Documentation/networking/dccp.txt b/Documentation/networking/dccp.txt index c2328c862e98..1910d097a0ad 100644 --- a/Documentation/networking/dccp.txt +++ b/Documentation/networking/dccp.txt @@ -19,21 +19,17 @@ for real time and multimedia traffic. It has a base protocol and pluggable congestion control IDs (CCIDs). -It is at draft RFC status and the homepage for DCCP as a protocol is at: - http://www.icir.org/kohler/dcp/ +It is at experimental RFC status and the homepage for DCCP as a protocol is at: + http://www.read.cs.ucla.edu/dccp/ Missing features ================ The DCCP implementation does not currently have all the features that are in -the draft RFC. +the RFC. -In particular the following are missing: -- CCID2 support -- feature negotiation - -When testing against other implementations it appears that elapsed time -options are not coded compliant to the specification. +The known bugs are at: + http://linux-net.osdl.org/index.php/TODO#DCCP Socket options ============== @@ -107,9 +103,6 @@ seq_window = 100 Notes ===== -SELinux does not yet have support for DCCP. You will need to turn it off or -else you will get EACCES. - -DCCP does not travel through NAT successfully at present. This is because -the checksum covers the psuedo-header as per TCP and UDP. It should be -relatively trivial to add Linux NAT support for DCCP. +DCCP does not travel through NAT successfully at present on many boxes. This is +because the checksum covers the psuedo-header as per TCP and UDP. Linux NAT +support for DCCP has been added.