From: Uwe Kleine-König Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 10:17:54 +0000 (+0200) Subject: ARM: imx25-pinfunc: document SION being important for MX25_PAD_SD1_CMD__SD1_CMD X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=da4fa6fa8016dba54aef2b20793b8e99c6af022d;p=GitHub%2Fmoto-9609%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git ARM: imx25-pinfunc: document SION being important for MX25_PAD_SD1_CMD__SD1_CMD Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo --- diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx25-pinfunc.h b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx25-pinfunc.h index f96fa2df8f11..953e646f3ea1 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx25-pinfunc.h +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx25-pinfunc.h @@ -421,6 +421,15 @@ #define MX25_PAD_UART2_CTS__FEC_RX_ERR 0x18c 0x384 0x518 0x12 0x002 #define MX25_PAD_UART2_CTS__GPIO_4_29 0x18c 0x384 0x000 0x15 0x000 +/* + * Removing the SION bit from MX25_PAD_SD1_CMD__SD1_CMD breaks detecting an SD + * card. According to the i.MX25 reference manual (e.g. Figure 23-2 in IMX25RM + * Rev. 2 from 01/2011) this pin is bidirectional. So it seems to be a silicon + * bug that configuring the SD1_CMD function doesn't enable the input path for + * this pin. + * This might have side effects for other hardware units that are connected to + * that pin and use the respective function as input. + */ #define MX25_PAD_SD1_CMD__SD1_CMD 0x190 0x388 0x000 0x10 0x000 #define MX25_PAD_SD1_CMD__CSPI2_MOSI 0x190 0x388 0x4a0 0x11 0x001 #define MX25_PAD_SD1_CMD__FEC_RDATA2 0x190 0x388 0x50c 0x12 0x002