From: Cindy H Kao <cindy.h.kao@intel.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 00:19:06 +0000 (-0700)
Subject: wimax/i2400m: Reset the TX FIFO indices when allocating the TX FIFO in tx_setup()
X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=d94401742dc662747db5bb9e444d353a4feba018;p=GitHub%2FLineageOS%2Fandroid_kernel_samsung_universal7580.git

wimax/i2400m: Reset the TX FIFO indices when allocating the TX FIFO in tx_setup()

This patch makes sure whenever tx_setup() is invoked during driver
initialization or device reset where TX FIFO is released and re-allocated,
the indices tx_in, tx_out, tx_msg_size, tx_sequence, tx_msg are properly
initialized.

When a device reset happens and the TX FIFO is released/re-allocated,
a new block of memory may be allocated for the TX FIFO, therefore tx_msg
should be cleared so that no any TX threads (tx_worker, tx) would access
to the out-of-date addresses.

Also, the TX threads use tx_in and tx_out to decide where to put the new
host-to-device messages and from where to copy them to the device HW FIFO,
these indices have to be cleared so after the TX FIFO is re-allocated during
the reset, the indices both refer to the head of the FIFO, ie. a new start.
The same rational applies to tx_msg_size and tx_sequence.

To protect the indices from being accessed by multiple threads simultaneously,
the lock tx_lock has to be obtained before the initializations and released
afterwards.

Signed-off-by: Cindy H Kao <cindy.h.kao@intel.com>
---

diff --git a/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/tx.c b/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/tx.c
index 8561c076653..21909e5d201 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/tx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/tx.c
@@ -877,27 +877,40 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2400m_tx_msg_sent);
  * i2400m_tx_setup - Initialize the TX queue and infrastructure
  *
  * Make sure we reset the TX sequence to zero, as when this function
- * is called, the firmware has been just restarted.
+ * is called, the firmware has been just restarted. Same rational
+ * for tx_in, tx_out, tx_msg_size and tx_msg. We reset them since
+ * the memory for TX queue is reallocated.
  */
 int i2400m_tx_setup(struct i2400m *i2400m)
 {
-	int result;
+	int result = 0;
+	void *tx_buf;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
 	/* Do this here only once -- can't do on
 	 * i2400m_hard_start_xmit() as we'll cause race conditions if
 	 * the WS was scheduled on another CPU */
 	INIT_WORK(&i2400m->wake_tx_ws, i2400m_wake_tx_work);
 
-	i2400m->tx_sequence = 0;
+	tx_buf = kmalloc(I2400M_TX_BUF_SIZE, GFP_ATOMIC);
+	if (tx_buf == NULL) {
+		result = -ENOMEM;
+		goto error_kmalloc;
+	}
+
 	 /* Warn if the calculated buffer size exceeds I2400M_TX_BUF_SIZE. */
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(I2400M_TX_PDU_TOTAL_SIZE > I2400M_TX_BUF_SIZE);
-	i2400m->tx_buf = kmalloc(I2400M_TX_BUF_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (i2400m->tx_buf == NULL)
-		result = -ENOMEM;
-	else
-		result = 0;
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&i2400m->tx_lock, flags);
+	i2400m->tx_sequence = 0;
+	i2400m->tx_in = 0;
+	i2400m->tx_out = 0;
+	i2400m->tx_msg_size = 0;
+	i2400m->tx_msg = NULL;
+	i2400m->tx_buf = tx_buf;
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i2400m->tx_lock, flags);
 	/* Huh? the bus layer has to define this... */
 	BUG_ON(i2400m->bus_tx_block_size == 0);
+error_kmalloc:
 	return result;
 
 }