From: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 11:07:41 +0000 (-0800)
Subject: [PATCH] make cap_ptrace enforce PTRACE_TRACME checks
X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=d4eb82c783992551c574580eb55fddc8bb006ad0;p=GitHub%2FLineageOS%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git

[PATCH] make cap_ptrace enforce PTRACE_TRACME checks

PTRACE_TRACEME doesn't have proper capabilities validation when parent is
less privileged than child.  Issue pointed out by Ram Gupta
<ram.gupta5@gmail.com>.

Note: I haven't identified a strong security issue, and it's a small ABI
change that could break apps that rely on existing behaviour (which allows
parent that is less privileged than child to ptrace when child does
PTRACE_TRACEME).

Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
Cc: Ram Gupta <ram.gupta5@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
---

diff --git a/security/commoncap.c b/security/commoncap.c
index 8a6e097f99ea..841eb4e5c62b 100644
--- a/security/commoncap.c
+++ b/security/commoncap.c
@@ -60,8 +60,8 @@ int cap_settime(struct timespec *ts, struct timezone *tz)
 int cap_ptrace (struct task_struct *parent, struct task_struct *child)
 {
 	/* Derived from arch/i386/kernel/ptrace.c:sys_ptrace. */
-	if (!cap_issubset (child->cap_permitted, current->cap_permitted) &&
-	    !capable(CAP_SYS_PTRACE))
+	if (!cap_issubset(child->cap_permitted, parent->cap_permitted) &&
+	    !__capable(parent, CAP_SYS_PTRACE))
 		return -EPERM;
 	return 0;
 }