From: David Howells Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:18:56 +0000 (+0100) Subject: MN10300: Change the fault handler to check in_atomic() not in_interrupt() X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=d1c6d2e547148c5aa0c0a4ff6aac82f7c6da1d8b;p=GitHub%2Fmoto-9609%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git MN10300: Change the fault handler to check in_atomic() not in_interrupt() Change the MN10300 fault handler to make it check in_atomic() rather than in_interrupt() as commit 6edaf68a87d17570790fd55f0c451a29ec1d6703 did for other architectures: Author: Peter Zijlstra Date: Wed Dec 6 20:32:18 2006 -0800 [PATCH] mm: arch do_page_fault() vs in_atomic() In light of the recent pagefault and filemap_copy_from_user work I've gone through all the arch pagefault handlers to make sure the inc_preempt_count() 'feature' works as expected. Several sections of code (including the new filemap_copy_from_user) rely on the fact that faults do not take locks under increased preempt count. Signed-off-by: David Howells Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- diff --git a/arch/mn10300/mm/fault.c b/arch/mn10300/mm/fault.c index 78f092ca0316..33cf25025dac 100644 --- a/arch/mn10300/mm/fault.c +++ b/arch/mn10300/mm/fault.c @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ asmlinkage void do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long fault_code, * If we're in an interrupt or have no user * context, we must not take the fault.. */ - if (in_interrupt() || !mm) + if (in_atomic() || !mm) goto no_context; down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);