From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 13:46:23 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: ARM: hw_breakpoint: reduce the number of WARN_ONCE invocations
X-Git-Tag: MMI-PSA29.97-13-9~18195^2~7^2~1
X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=d12443363e590461655d4e9ccc31e40ad9078283;p=GitHub%2FMotorolaMobilityLLC%2Fkernel-slsi.git

ARM: hw_breakpoint: reduce the number of WARN_ONCE invocations

The ARM hw_breakpoint backend is currently a bit too noisy when things
start to go awry.

This patch removes a couple of over-zealous WARN_ONCE invocations and
replaces then with pr_warnings instead.

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
---

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
index 64ac5c672396..5a46225f007e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
@@ -136,10 +136,11 @@ static u8 get_debug_arch(void)
 	u32 didr;
 
 	/* Do we implement the extended CPUID interface? */
-	if (WARN_ONCE((((read_cpuid_id() >> 16) & 0xf) != 0xf),
-	    "CPUID feature registers not supported. "
-	    "Assuming v6 debug is present.\n"))
+	if (((read_cpuid_id() >> 16) & 0xf) != 0xf) {
+		pr_warning("CPUID feature registers not supported. "
+			   "Assuming v6 debug is present.\n");
 		return ARM_DEBUG_ARCH_V6;
+	}
 
 	ARM_DBG_READ(c0, 0, didr);
 	return (didr >> 16) & 0xf;
@@ -231,7 +232,7 @@ static int enable_monitor_mode(void)
 
 	/* Ensure that halting mode is disabled. */
 	if (WARN_ONCE(dscr & ARM_DSCR_HDBGEN,
-			"halting debug mode enabled. Unable to access hardware resources.\n")) {
+		"halting debug mode enabled. Unable to access hardware resources.\n")) {
 		ret = -EPERM;
 		goto out;
 	}
@@ -626,10 +627,9 @@ int arch_validate_hwbkpt_settings(struct perf_event *bp)
 	 * we can use the mismatch feature as a poor-man's hardware
 	 * single-step, but this only works for per-task breakpoints.
 	 */
-	if (WARN_ONCE(!bp->overflow_handler &&
-		(arch_check_bp_in_kernelspace(bp) || !core_has_mismatch_brps()
-		 || !bp->hw.bp_target),
-			"overflow handler required but none found\n")) {
+	if (!bp->overflow_handler && (arch_check_bp_in_kernelspace(bp) ||
+	    !core_has_mismatch_brps() || !bp->hw.bp_target)) {
+		pr_warning("overflow handler required but none found\n");
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 	}
 out: