From: Nick Piggin Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 03:49:30 +0000 (+1000) Subject: generic-ipi: fix stack and rcu interaction bug in smp_call_function_mask() X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=cc7a486cac78f6fc1a24e8cd63036bae8d2ab431;p=GitHub%2FLineageOS%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git generic-ipi: fix stack and rcu interaction bug in smp_call_function_mask() * Venki Pallipadi wrote: > Found a OOPS on a big SMP box during an overnight reboot test with > upstream git. > > Suresh and I looked at the oops and looks like the root cause is in > generic_smp_call_function_interrupt() and smp_call_function_mask() with > wait parameter. > > The actual oops looked like > > [ 11.277260] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffff8802ffffffff > [ 11.277815] IP: [] 0xffff8802ffffffff > [ 11.278155] PGD 202063 PUD 0 > [ 11.278576] Oops: 0010 [1] SMP > [ 11.279006] CPU 5 > [ 11.279336] Modules linked in: > [ 11.279752] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.27-rc2-00020-g685d87f #290 > [ 11.280039] RIP: 0010:[] [] 0xffff8802ffffffff > [ 11.280692] RSP: 0018:ffff88027f1f7f70 EFLAGS: 00010086 > [ 11.280976] RAX: 00000000ffffffff RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000 > [ 11.281264] RDX: 0000000000004f4e RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000000000 > [ 11.281624] RBP: ffff88027f1f7f98 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffffff802509af > [ 11.281925] R10: ffff8800280c2780 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88027f097d48 > [ 11.282214] R13: ffff88027f097d70 R14: 0000000000000005 R15: ffff88027e571000 > [ 11.282502] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88027f1c3340(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > [ 11.283096] CS: 0010 DS: 0018 ES: 0018 CR0: 000000008005003b > [ 11.283382] CR2: ffff8802ffffffff CR3: 0000000000201000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 > [ 11.283760] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 > [ 11.284048] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 > [ 11.284337] Process swapper (pid: 0, threadinfo ffff88027f1f2000, task ffff88027f1f0640) > [ 11.284936] Stack: ffffffff80250963 0000000000000212 0000000000ee8c78 0000000000ee8a66 > [ 11.285802] ffff88027e571550 ffff88027f1f7fa8 ffffffff8021adb5 ffff88027f1f3e40 > [ 11.286599] ffffffff8020bdd6 ffff88027f1f3e40 ffff88027f1f3ef8 0000000000000000 > [ 11.287120] Call Trace: > [ 11.287768] [] ? generic_smp_call_function_interrupt+0x61/0x12c > [ 11.288354] [] smp_call_function_interrupt+0x17/0x27 > [ 11.288744] [] call_function_interrupt+0x66/0x70 > [ 11.289030] [] ? clockevents_notify+0x19/0x73 > [ 11.289380] [] ? acpi_idle_enter_simple+0x18b/0x1fa > [ 11.289760] [] ? acpi_idle_enter_simple+0x181/0x1fa > [ 11.290051] [] ? cpuidle_idle_call+0x70/0xa2 > [ 11.290338] [] ? cpu_idle+0x5f/0x7d > [ 11.290723] [] ? start_secondary+0x14d/0x152 > [ 11.291010] > [ 11.291287] > [ 11.291654] Code: Bad RIP value. > [ 11.292041] RIP [] 0xffff8802ffffffff > [ 11.292380] RSP > [ 11.292741] CR2: ffff8802ffffffff > [ 11.310951] ---[ end trace 137c54d525305f1c ]--- > > The problem is with the following sequence of events: > > - CPU A calls smp_call_function_mask() for CPU B with wait parameter > - CPU A sets up the call_function_data on the stack and does an rcu add to > call_function_queue > - CPU A waits until the WAIT flag is cleared > - CPU B gets the call function interrupt and starts going through the > call_function_queue > - CPU C also gets some other call function interrupt and starts going through > the call_function_queue > - CPU C, which is also going through the call_function_queue, starts referencing > CPU A's stack, as that element is still in call_function_queue > - CPU B finishes the function call that CPU A set up and as there are no other > references to it, rcu deletes the call_function_data (which was from CPU A > stack) > - CPU B sees the wait flag and just clears the flag (no call_rcu to free) > - CPU A which was waiting on the flag continues executing and the stack > contents change > > - CPU C is still in rcu_read section accessing the CPU A's stack sees > inconsistent call_funation_data and can try to execute > function with some random pointer, causing stack corruption for A > (by clearing the bits in mask field) and oops. Nice debugging work. I'd suggest something like the attached (boot tested) patch as the simple fix for now. I expect the benefits from the less synchronized, multiple-in-flight-data global queue will still outweigh the costs of dynamic allocations. But if worst comes to worst then we just go back to a globally synchronous one-at-a-time implementation, but that would be pretty sad! Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c index 96fc7c0edc59..e6084f6efb4d 100644 --- a/kernel/smp.c +++ b/kernel/smp.c @@ -260,6 +260,41 @@ void __smp_call_function_single(int cpu, struct call_single_data *data) generic_exec_single(cpu, data); } +/* Dummy function */ +static void quiesce_dummy(void *unused) +{ +} + +/* + * Ensure stack based data used in call function mask is safe to free. + * + * This is needed by smp_call_function_mask when using on-stack data, because + * a single call function queue is shared by all CPUs, and any CPU may pick up + * the data item on the queue at any time before it is deleted. So we need to + * ensure that all CPUs have transitioned through a quiescent state after + * this call. + * + * This is a very slow function, implemented by sending synchronous IPIs to + * all possible CPUs. For this reason, we have to alloc data rather than use + * stack based data even in the case of synchronous calls. The stack based + * data is then just used for deadlock/oom fallback which will be very rare. + * + * If a faster scheme can be made, we could go back to preferring stack based + * data -- the data allocation/free is non-zero cost. + */ +static void smp_call_function_mask_quiesce_stack(cpumask_t mask) +{ + struct call_single_data data; + int cpu; + + data.func = quiesce_dummy; + data.info = NULL; + data.flags = CSD_FLAG_WAIT; + + for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, mask) + generic_exec_single(cpu, &data); +} + /** * smp_call_function_mask(): Run a function on a set of other CPUs. * @mask: The set of cpus to run on. @@ -285,6 +320,7 @@ int smp_call_function_mask(cpumask_t mask, void (*func)(void *), void *info, cpumask_t allbutself; unsigned long flags; int cpu, num_cpus; + int slowpath = 0; /* Can deadlock when called with interrupts disabled */ WARN_ON(irqs_disabled()); @@ -306,15 +342,16 @@ int smp_call_function_mask(cpumask_t mask, void (*func)(void *), void *info, return smp_call_function_single(cpu, func, info, wait); } - if (!wait) { - data = kmalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_ATOMIC); - if (data) - data->csd.flags = CSD_FLAG_ALLOC; - } - if (!data) { + data = kmalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_ATOMIC); + if (data) { + data->csd.flags = CSD_FLAG_ALLOC; + if (wait) + data->csd.flags |= CSD_FLAG_WAIT; + } else { data = &d; data->csd.flags = CSD_FLAG_WAIT; wait = 1; + slowpath = 1; } spin_lock_init(&data->lock); @@ -331,8 +368,11 @@ int smp_call_function_mask(cpumask_t mask, void (*func)(void *), void *info, arch_send_call_function_ipi(mask); /* optionally wait for the CPUs to complete */ - if (wait) + if (wait) { csd_flag_wait(&data->csd); + if (unlikely(slowpath)) + smp_call_function_mask_quiesce_stack(allbutself); + } return 0; }