From: Pavankumar Kondeti Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 16:20:17 +0000 (+0530) Subject: tracing: Use SOFTIRQ_OFFSET for softirq dectection for more accurate results X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=c59f29cb144a6a0dfac16ede9dc8eafc02dc56ca;p=GitHub%2Fmoto-9609%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git tracing: Use SOFTIRQ_OFFSET for softirq dectection for more accurate results The 's' flag is supposed to indicate that a softirq is running. This can be detected by testing the preempt_count with SOFTIRQ_OFFSET. The current code tests the preempt_count with SOFTIRQ_MASK, which would be true even when softirqs are disabled but not serving a softirq. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1481300417-3564-1-git-send-email-pkondeti@codeaurora.org Signed-off-by: Pavankumar Kondeti Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt --- diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c index 6f420d7b703b..970aafe80b49 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c @@ -1949,7 +1949,7 @@ tracing_generic_entry_update(struct trace_entry *entry, unsigned long flags, #endif ((pc & NMI_MASK ) ? TRACE_FLAG_NMI : 0) | ((pc & HARDIRQ_MASK) ? TRACE_FLAG_HARDIRQ : 0) | - ((pc & SOFTIRQ_MASK) ? TRACE_FLAG_SOFTIRQ : 0) | + ((pc & SOFTIRQ_OFFSET) ? TRACE_FLAG_SOFTIRQ : 0) | (tif_need_resched() ? TRACE_FLAG_NEED_RESCHED : 0) | (test_preempt_need_resched() ? TRACE_FLAG_PREEMPT_RESCHED : 0); }