From: Trond Myklebust Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 00:26:52 +0000 (-0400) Subject: NFS: Remove the buggy lock-if-signalled case from do_setlk() X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=c4d7c402b788b73dc24f1e54a57f89d3dc5eb7bc;p=GitHub%2Fexynos8895%2Fandroid_kernel_samsung_universal8895.git NFS: Remove the buggy lock-if-signalled case from do_setlk() Both NLM and NFSv4 should be able to clean up adequately in the case where the user interrupts the RPC call... Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust --- diff --git a/fs/nfs/file.c b/fs/nfs/file.c index 10e8b807e7ff..742cb745cb47 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/file.c +++ b/fs/nfs/file.c @@ -566,17 +566,9 @@ static int do_setlk(struct file *filp, int cmd, struct file_lock *fl) lock_kernel(); /* Use local locking if mounted with "-onolock" */ - if (!(NFS_SERVER(inode)->flags & NFS_MOUNT_NONLM)) { + if (!(NFS_SERVER(inode)->flags & NFS_MOUNT_NONLM)) status = NFS_PROTO(inode)->lock(filp, cmd, fl); - /* If we were signalled we still need to ensure that - * we clean up any state on the server. We therefore - * record the lock call as having succeeded in order to - * ensure that locks_remove_posix() cleans it out when - * the process exits. - */ - if (status == -EINTR || status == -ERESTARTSYS) - do_vfs_lock(filp, fl); - } else + else status = do_vfs_lock(filp, fl); unlock_kernel(); if (status < 0)