From: Rik van Riel Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 19:28:47 +0000 (-0400) Subject: sched/numa: Scale scan period with tasks in group and shared/private X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=b5dd77c8bdada7b6262d0cba02a6ed525bf4e6e1;p=GitHub%2Fmoto-9609%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git sched/numa: Scale scan period with tasks in group and shared/private Running 80 tasks in the same group, or as threads of the same process, results in the memory getting scanned 80x as fast as it would be if a single task was using the memory. This really hurts some workloads. Scale the scan period by the number of tasks in the numa group, and the shared / private ratio, so the average rate at which memory in the group is scanned corresponds roughly to the rate at which a single task would scan its memory. Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Acked-by: Mel Gorman Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: jhladky@redhat.com Cc: lvenanci@redhat.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170731192847.23050-3-riel@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index cb6b7c83b74d..a7f1c3b797f8 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -1071,6 +1071,29 @@ unsigned int sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_size = 256; /* Scan @scan_size MB every @scan_period after an initial @scan_delay in ms */ unsigned int sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_delay = 1000; +struct numa_group { + atomic_t refcount; + + spinlock_t lock; /* nr_tasks, tasks */ + int nr_tasks; + pid_t gid; + int active_nodes; + + struct rcu_head rcu; + unsigned long total_faults; + unsigned long max_faults_cpu; + /* + * Faults_cpu is used to decide whether memory should move + * towards the CPU. As a consequence, these stats are weighted + * more by CPU use than by memory faults. + */ + unsigned long *faults_cpu; + unsigned long faults[0]; +}; + +static inline unsigned long group_faults_priv(struct numa_group *ng); +static inline unsigned long group_faults_shared(struct numa_group *ng); + static unsigned int task_nr_scan_windows(struct task_struct *p) { unsigned long rss = 0; @@ -1107,13 +1130,47 @@ static unsigned int task_scan_min(struct task_struct *p) return max_t(unsigned int, floor, scan); } +static unsigned int task_scan_start(struct task_struct *p) +{ + unsigned long smin = task_scan_min(p); + unsigned long period = smin; + + /* Scale the maximum scan period with the amount of shared memory. */ + if (p->numa_group) { + struct numa_group *ng = p->numa_group; + unsigned long shared = group_faults_shared(ng); + unsigned long private = group_faults_priv(ng); + + period *= atomic_read(&ng->refcount); + period *= shared + 1; + period /= private + shared + 1; + } + + return max(smin, period); +} + static unsigned int task_scan_max(struct task_struct *p) { - unsigned int smin = task_scan_min(p); - unsigned int smax; + unsigned long smin = task_scan_min(p); + unsigned long smax; /* Watch for min being lower than max due to floor calculations */ smax = sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_period_max / task_nr_scan_windows(p); + + /* Scale the maximum scan period with the amount of shared memory. */ + if (p->numa_group) { + struct numa_group *ng = p->numa_group; + unsigned long shared = group_faults_shared(ng); + unsigned long private = group_faults_priv(ng); + unsigned long period = smax; + + period *= atomic_read(&ng->refcount); + period *= shared + 1; + period /= private + shared + 1; + + smax = max(smax, period); + } + return max(smin, smax); } @@ -1129,26 +1186,6 @@ static void account_numa_dequeue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) rq->nr_preferred_running -= (p->numa_preferred_nid == task_node(p)); } -struct numa_group { - atomic_t refcount; - - spinlock_t lock; /* nr_tasks, tasks */ - int nr_tasks; - pid_t gid; - int active_nodes; - - struct rcu_head rcu; - unsigned long total_faults; - unsigned long max_faults_cpu; - /* - * Faults_cpu is used to decide whether memory should move - * towards the CPU. As a consequence, these stats are weighted - * more by CPU use than by memory faults. - */ - unsigned long *faults_cpu; - unsigned long faults[0]; -}; - /* Shared or private faults. */ #define NR_NUMA_HINT_FAULT_TYPES 2 @@ -1198,6 +1235,30 @@ static inline unsigned long group_faults_cpu(struct numa_group *group, int nid) group->faults_cpu[task_faults_idx(NUMA_MEM, nid, 1)]; } +static inline unsigned long group_faults_priv(struct numa_group *ng) +{ + unsigned long faults = 0; + int node; + + for_each_online_node(node) { + faults += ng->faults[task_faults_idx(NUMA_MEM, node, 1)]; + } + + return faults; +} + +static inline unsigned long group_faults_shared(struct numa_group *ng) +{ + unsigned long faults = 0; + int node; + + for_each_online_node(node) { + faults += ng->faults[task_faults_idx(NUMA_MEM, node, 0)]; + } + + return faults; +} + /* * A node triggering more than 1/3 as many NUMA faults as the maximum is * considered part of a numa group's pseudo-interleaving set. Migrations @@ -1808,7 +1869,7 @@ static int task_numa_migrate(struct task_struct *p) * Reset the scan period if the task is being rescheduled on an * alternative node to recheck if the tasks is now properly placed. */ - p->numa_scan_period = task_scan_min(p); + p->numa_scan_period = task_scan_start(p); if (env.best_task == NULL) { ret = migrate_task_to(p, env.best_cpu); @@ -2459,7 +2520,7 @@ void task_numa_work(struct callback_head *work) if (p->numa_scan_period == 0) { p->numa_scan_period_max = task_scan_max(p); - p->numa_scan_period = task_scan_min(p); + p->numa_scan_period = task_scan_start(p); } next_scan = now + msecs_to_jiffies(p->numa_scan_period); @@ -2587,7 +2648,7 @@ void task_tick_numa(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr) if (now > curr->node_stamp + period) { if (!curr->node_stamp) - curr->numa_scan_period = task_scan_min(curr); + curr->numa_scan_period = task_scan_start(curr); curr->node_stamp += period; if (!time_before(jiffies, curr->mm->numa_next_scan)) {