From: Jarkko Nikula Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 17:25:34 +0000 (+0000) Subject: omap: rx51: Cleanup vdds_sdi supply construction X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=b5b9945b2b139ca922b49062053f34486ca64cca;p=GitHub%2FLineageOS%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git omap: rx51: Cleanup vdds_sdi supply construction It is much more cleaner to use REGULATOR_SUPPLY macro and a device name instead of having a reference to rx51_display_device.dev with #if defined() guards. Signed-off-by: Jarkko Nikula Acked-by: Tomi Valkeinen Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren --- diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c index fd95ccf8be5c..768f0dcdc34e 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c @@ -359,17 +359,8 @@ static struct regulator_consumer_supply rx51_vio_supplies[] = { REGULATOR_SUPPLY("DVDD", "2-0019"), }; -#if defined(CONFIG_FB_OMAP2) || defined(CONFIG_FB_OMAP2_MODULE) -extern struct platform_device rx51_display_device; -#endif - static struct regulator_consumer_supply rx51_vaux1_consumers[] = { -#if defined(CONFIG_FB_OMAP2) || defined(CONFIG_FB_OMAP2_MODULE) - { - .supply = "vdds_sdi", - .dev = &rx51_display_device.dev, - }, -#endif + REGULATOR_SUPPLY("vdds_sdi", "omapdss"), }; static struct regulator_init_data rx51_vaux1 = {