From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 15:29:12 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: [PATCH] x86_64: Rename struct node in x86-64 NUMA code to struct bootnode
X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=abe059e7590fd4475285f2d037c70dec712a4572;p=GitHub%2FLineageOS%2FG12%2Fandroid_kernel_amlogic_linux-4.9.git

[PATCH] x86_64: Rename struct node in x86-64 NUMA code to struct bootnode

It conflicts with the struct node in node.h
Actually the x86-64 version was there first, but ..

Suggested by Jan Beulich

Cc: jbeulich@novell.com
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
---

diff --git a/arch/x86_64/mm/k8topology.c b/arch/x86_64/mm/k8topology.c
index dd60e71fdba6..7c45c2d2b8b2 100644
--- a/arch/x86_64/mm/k8topology.c
+++ b/arch/x86_64/mm/k8topology.c
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ static __init int find_northbridge(void)
 int __init k8_scan_nodes(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
 { 
 	unsigned long prevbase;
-	struct node nodes[8];
+	struct bootnode nodes[8];
 	int nodeid, i, nb; 
 	unsigned char nodeids[8];
 	int found = 0;
diff --git a/arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c
index 22e51beee8d3..e4b62753a19a 100644
--- a/arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ int numa_off __initdata;
  * -1 if node overlap or lost ram (shift too big)
  */
 static int __init
-populate_memnodemap(const struct node *nodes, int numnodes, int shift)
+populate_memnodemap(const struct bootnode *nodes, int numnodes, int shift)
 {
 	int i; 
 	int res = -1;
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ populate_memnodemap(const struct node *nodes, int numnodes, int shift)
 	return res;
 }
 
-int __init compute_hash_shift(struct node *nodes, int numnodes)
+int __init compute_hash_shift(struct bootnode *nodes, int numnodes)
 {
 	int shift = 20;
 
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ int numa_fake __initdata = 0;
 static int numa_emulation(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
 {
  	int i;
- 	struct node nodes[MAX_NUMNODES];
+ 	struct bootnode nodes[MAX_NUMNODES];
  	unsigned long sz = ((end_pfn - start_pfn)<<PAGE_SHIFT) / numa_fake;
 
  	/* Kludge needed for the hash function */
diff --git a/arch/x86_64/mm/srat.c b/arch/x86_64/mm/srat.c
index 482c25767369..2eb879590dc4 100644
--- a/arch/x86_64/mm/srat.c
+++ b/arch/x86_64/mm/srat.c
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ static struct acpi_table_slit *acpi_slit;
 
 static nodemask_t nodes_parsed __initdata;
 static nodemask_t nodes_found __initdata;
-static struct node nodes[MAX_NUMNODES] __initdata;
+static struct bootnode nodes[MAX_NUMNODES] __initdata;
 static u8 pxm2node[256] = { [0 ... 255] = 0xff };
 
 /* Too small nodes confuse the VM badly. Usually they result
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static __init int conflicting_nodes(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
 {
 	int i;
 	for_each_node_mask(i, nodes_parsed) {
-		struct node *nd = &nodes[i];
+		struct bootnode *nd = &nodes[i];
 		if (nd->start == nd->end)
 			continue;
 		if (nd->end > start && nd->start < end)
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static __init int conflicting_nodes(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
 
 static __init void cutoff_node(int i, unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
 {
-	struct node *nd = &nodes[i];
+	struct bootnode *nd = &nodes[i];
 	if (nd->start < start) {
 		nd->start = start;
 		if (nd->end < nd->start)
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ acpi_numa_processor_affinity_init(struct acpi_table_processor_affinity *pa)
 void __init
 acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init(struct acpi_table_memory_affinity *ma)
 {
-	struct node *nd;
+	struct bootnode *nd;
 	unsigned long start, end;
 	int node, pxm;
 	int i;
diff --git a/include/asm-x86_64/numa.h b/include/asm-x86_64/numa.h
index dffe276ca2df..f6cbb4cbb5a3 100644
--- a/include/asm-x86_64/numa.h
+++ b/include/asm-x86_64/numa.h
@@ -4,11 +4,11 @@
 #include <linux/nodemask.h>
 #include <asm/numnodes.h>
 
-struct node { 
+struct bootnode {
 	u64 start,end; 
 };
 
-extern int compute_hash_shift(struct node *nodes, int numnodes);
+extern int compute_hash_shift(struct bootnode *nodes, int numnodes);
 extern int pxm_to_node(int nid);
 
 #define ZONE_ALIGN (1UL << (MAX_ORDER+PAGE_SHIFT))