From: Daniel Vetter Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 13:26:47 +0000 (+0200) Subject: drm/i915: Rework sdvo proxy i2c locking X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=a85066840d29;p=GitHub%2FLineageOS%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git drm/i915: Rework sdvo proxy i2c locking lockdep complaints about a locking recursion for the i2c bus lock because both the sdvo ddc proxy bus and the gmbus nested within use the same locking class. It's not really a deadlock since we never nest the other way round, but it's annoying. Fix it by pulling the gmbus locking into the i2c lock_ops for both i2c_adapater and making sure that the ddc_proxy_xfer function is entirely lockless. Re-layouting the extracted function resulted in some whitespace cleanups, I figured we might as well keep them. v2: Review from Chris: - s/locked/unlocked/ since I got the naming backwards - Use the vfuncs of the proxied adatper instead of re-rolling copies. That's more consistent with the other proxying we're doing. Cc: Chris Wilson Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170726132647.31833-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_i2c.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_i2c.c index 3c9e00d4ba5a..6698826954e1 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_i2c.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_i2c.c @@ -592,7 +592,6 @@ gmbus_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, struct i2c_msg *msgs, int num) int ret; intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_GMBUS); - mutex_lock(&dev_priv->gmbus_mutex); if (bus->force_bit) { ret = i2c_bit_algo.master_xfer(adapter, msgs, num); @@ -604,7 +603,6 @@ gmbus_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, struct i2c_msg *msgs, int num) bus->force_bit |= GMBUS_FORCE_BIT_RETRY; } - mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->gmbus_mutex); intel_display_power_put(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_GMBUS); return ret; @@ -624,6 +622,39 @@ static const struct i2c_algorithm gmbus_algorithm = { .functionality = gmbus_func }; +static void gmbus_lock_bus(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, + unsigned int flags) +{ + struct intel_gmbus *bus = to_intel_gmbus(adapter); + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = bus->dev_priv; + + mutex_lock(&dev_priv->gmbus_mutex); +} + +static int gmbus_trylock_bus(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, + unsigned int flags) +{ + struct intel_gmbus *bus = to_intel_gmbus(adapter); + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = bus->dev_priv; + + return mutex_trylock(&dev_priv->gmbus_mutex); +} + +static void gmbus_unlock_bus(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, + unsigned int flags) +{ + struct intel_gmbus *bus = to_intel_gmbus(adapter); + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = bus->dev_priv; + + mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->gmbus_mutex); +} + +const struct i2c_lock_operations gmbus_lock_ops = { + .lock_bus = gmbus_lock_bus, + .trylock_bus = gmbus_trylock_bus, + .unlock_bus = gmbus_unlock_bus, +}; + /** * intel_gmbus_setup - instantiate all Intel i2c GMBuses * @dev_priv: i915 device private @@ -665,6 +696,7 @@ int intel_setup_gmbus(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) bus->dev_priv = dev_priv; bus->adapter.algo = &gmbus_algorithm; + bus->adapter.lock_ops = &gmbus_lock_ops; /* * We wish to retry with bit banging diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c index e58a47db9a9d..c14c05e8a543 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c @@ -451,23 +451,24 @@ static const char * const cmd_status_names[] = { "Scaling not supported" }; -static bool intel_sdvo_write_cmd(struct intel_sdvo *intel_sdvo, u8 cmd, - const void *args, int args_len) +static bool __intel_sdvo_write_cmd(struct intel_sdvo *intel_sdvo, u8 cmd, + const void *args, int args_len, + bool unlocked) { u8 *buf, status; struct i2c_msg *msgs; int i, ret = true; - /* Would be simpler to allocate both in one go ? */ + /* Would be simpler to allocate both in one go ? */ buf = kzalloc(args_len * 2 + 2, GFP_KERNEL); if (!buf) return false; msgs = kcalloc(args_len + 3, sizeof(*msgs), GFP_KERNEL); if (!msgs) { - kfree(buf); + kfree(buf); return false; - } + } intel_sdvo_debug_write(intel_sdvo, cmd, args, args_len); @@ -498,7 +499,10 @@ static bool intel_sdvo_write_cmd(struct intel_sdvo *intel_sdvo, u8 cmd, msgs[i+2].len = 1; msgs[i+2].buf = &status; - ret = i2c_transfer(intel_sdvo->i2c, msgs, i+3); + if (unlocked) + ret = i2c_transfer(intel_sdvo->i2c, msgs, i+3); + else + ret = __i2c_transfer(intel_sdvo->i2c, msgs, i+3); if (ret < 0) { DRM_DEBUG_KMS("I2c transfer returned %d\n", ret); ret = false; @@ -516,6 +520,12 @@ out: return ret; } +static bool intel_sdvo_write_cmd(struct intel_sdvo *intel_sdvo, u8 cmd, + const void *args, int args_len) +{ + return __intel_sdvo_write_cmd(intel_sdvo, cmd, args, args_len, true); +} + static bool intel_sdvo_read_response(struct intel_sdvo *intel_sdvo, void *response, int response_len) { @@ -602,13 +612,13 @@ static int intel_sdvo_get_pixel_multiplier(const struct drm_display_mode *adjust return 4; } -static bool intel_sdvo_set_control_bus_switch(struct intel_sdvo *intel_sdvo, - u8 ddc_bus) +static bool __intel_sdvo_set_control_bus_switch(struct intel_sdvo *intel_sdvo, + u8 ddc_bus) { /* This must be the immediately preceding write before the i2c xfer */ - return intel_sdvo_write_cmd(intel_sdvo, - SDVO_CMD_SET_CONTROL_BUS_SWITCH, - &ddc_bus, 1); + return __intel_sdvo_write_cmd(intel_sdvo, + SDVO_CMD_SET_CONTROL_BUS_SWITCH, + &ddc_bus, 1, false); } static bool intel_sdvo_set_value(struct intel_sdvo *intel_sdvo, u8 cmd, const void *data, int len) @@ -2926,7 +2936,7 @@ static int intel_sdvo_ddc_proxy_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, { struct intel_sdvo *sdvo = adapter->algo_data; - if (!intel_sdvo_set_control_bus_switch(sdvo, sdvo->ddc_bus)) + if (!__intel_sdvo_set_control_bus_switch(sdvo, sdvo->ddc_bus)) return -EIO; return sdvo->i2c->algo->master_xfer(sdvo->i2c, msgs, num); @@ -2943,6 +2953,33 @@ static const struct i2c_algorithm intel_sdvo_ddc_proxy = { .functionality = intel_sdvo_ddc_proxy_func }; +static void proxy_lock_bus(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, + unsigned int flags) +{ + struct intel_sdvo *sdvo = adapter->algo_data; + sdvo->i2c->lock_ops->lock_bus(sdvo->i2c, flags); +} + +static int proxy_trylock_bus(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, + unsigned int flags) +{ + struct intel_sdvo *sdvo = adapter->algo_data; + return sdvo->i2c->lock_ops->trylock_bus(sdvo->i2c, flags); +} + +static void proxy_unlock_bus(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, + unsigned int flags) +{ + struct intel_sdvo *sdvo = adapter->algo_data; + sdvo->i2c->lock_ops->unlock_bus(sdvo->i2c, flags); +} + +const struct i2c_lock_operations proxy_lock_ops = { + .lock_bus = proxy_lock_bus, + .trylock_bus = proxy_trylock_bus, + .unlock_bus = proxy_unlock_bus, +}; + static bool intel_sdvo_init_ddc_proxy(struct intel_sdvo *sdvo, struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) @@ -2955,6 +2992,7 @@ intel_sdvo_init_ddc_proxy(struct intel_sdvo *sdvo, sdvo->ddc.dev.parent = &pdev->dev; sdvo->ddc.algo_data = sdvo; sdvo->ddc.algo = &intel_sdvo_ddc_proxy; + sdvo->ddc.lock_ops = &proxy_lock_ops; return i2c_add_adapter(&sdvo->ddc) == 0; }