From: Eric W. Biederman Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2015 18:36:41 +0000 (-0500) Subject: dcache: Reduce the scope of i_lock in d_splice_alias X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=a03e283bf5c3d4851b4998122196ce9f849e6dfb;p=GitHub%2Fmoto-9609%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git dcache: Reduce the scope of i_lock in d_splice_alias i_lock is only needed until __d_find_any_alias calls dget on the alias dentry. After that the reference to new ensures that dentry_kill and d_delete will not remove the inode from the dentry, and remove the dentry from the inode->d_entry list. The inode i_lock came to be held over the the __d_move calls in d_splice_alias through a series of introduction of locks with increasing smaller scope. First it was the dcache_lock, then it was the dcache_inode_lock, and finally inode->i_lock. Furthermore inode->i_lock is not held over any other calls to d_move or __d_move so it can not provide any meaningful rename protection. Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" Signed-off-by: Al Viro --- diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c index e3b44ca75a1b..5c33aeb0f68f 100644 --- a/fs/dcache.c +++ b/fs/dcache.c @@ -2718,7 +2718,7 @@ struct dentry *d_ancestor(struct dentry *p1, struct dentry *p2) * This helper attempts to cope with remotely renamed directories * * It assumes that the caller is already holding - * dentry->d_parent->d_inode->i_mutex, inode->i_lock and rename_lock + * dentry->d_parent->d_inode->i_mutex, and rename_lock * * Note: If ever the locking in lock_rename() changes, then please * remember to update this too... @@ -2744,7 +2744,6 @@ out_unalias: __d_move(alias, dentry, false); ret = 0; out_err: - spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock); if (m2) mutex_unlock(m2); if (m1) @@ -2790,10 +2789,11 @@ struct dentry *d_splice_alias(struct inode *inode, struct dentry *dentry) if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) { struct dentry *new = __d_find_any_alias(inode); if (unlikely(new)) { + /* The reference to new ensures it remains an alias */ + spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock); write_seqlock(&rename_lock); if (unlikely(d_ancestor(new, dentry))) { write_sequnlock(&rename_lock); - spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock); dput(new); new = ERR_PTR(-ELOOP); pr_warn_ratelimited( @@ -2812,7 +2812,6 @@ struct dentry *d_splice_alias(struct inode *inode, struct dentry *dentry) } else { __d_move(new, dentry, false); write_sequnlock(&rename_lock); - spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock); security_d_instantiate(new, inode); } iput(inode);