From: Alexey Dobriyan Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 07:23:51 +0000 (-0800) Subject: net: shy netns_ok check X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=9c0188acf6dd6990bac9cd906cd554a1476c6d12;p=GitHub%2Fmoto-9609%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git net: shy netns_ok check Failure to pass netns_ok check is SILENT, except some MIB counter is incremented somewhere. And adding "netns_ok = 1" (after long head-scratching session) is usually the last step in making some protocol netns-ready... Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_input.c b/net/ipv4/ip_input.c index 861978a4f1a8..cfb38ac9d698 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/ip_input.c +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_input.c @@ -209,9 +209,17 @@ static int ip_local_deliver_finish(struct sk_buff *skb) hash = protocol & (MAX_INET_PROTOS - 1); ipprot = rcu_dereference(inet_protos[hash]); - if (ipprot != NULL && (net == &init_net || ipprot->netns_ok)) { + if (ipprot != NULL) { int ret; + if (!net_eq(net, &init_net) && !ipprot->netns_ok) { + if (net_ratelimit()) + printk("%s: proto %d isn't netns-ready\n", + __func__, protocol); + kfree_skb(skb); + goto out; + } + if (!ipprot->no_policy) { if (!xfrm4_policy_check(NULL, XFRM_POLICY_IN, skb)) { kfree_skb(skb);