From: Florian Westphal Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 17:21:55 +0000 (+0100) Subject: netfilter: reduce direct skb->nfct usage X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=97a6ad13decc16c5adbf181283932daba7e17faf;p=GitHub%2FLineageOS%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git netfilter: reduce direct skb->nfct usage Next patch makes direct skb->nfct access illegal, reduce noise in next patch by using accessors we already have. Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso --- diff --git a/include/net/ip_vs.h b/include/net/ip_vs.h index cd6018a9ee24..2a344ebd7ebe 100644 --- a/include/net/ip_vs.h +++ b/include/net/ip_vs.h @@ -1554,10 +1554,13 @@ static inline void ip_vs_notrack(struct sk_buff *skb) struct nf_conn *ct = nf_ct_get(skb, &ctinfo); if (!ct || !nf_ct_is_untracked(ct)) { - nf_conntrack_put(skb->nfct); - skb->nfct = &nf_ct_untracked_get()->ct_general; + struct nf_conn *untracked; + + nf_conntrack_put(&ct->ct_general); + untracked = nf_ct_untracked_get(); + nf_conntrack_get(&untracked->ct_general); + skb->nfct = &untracked->ct_general; skb->nfctinfo = IP_CT_NEW; - nf_conntrack_get(skb->nfct); } #endif } diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c index 86186a2e2715..adb7af3a4c4c 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c @@ -686,8 +686,11 @@ static int nf_ct_resolve_clash(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb, !nfct_nat(ct) && !nf_ct_is_dying(ct) && atomic_inc_not_zero(&ct->ct_general.use)) { - nf_ct_acct_merge(ct, ctinfo, (struct nf_conn *)skb->nfct); - nf_conntrack_put(skb->nfct); + enum ip_conntrack_info oldinfo; + struct nf_conn *loser_ct = nf_ct_get(skb, &oldinfo); + + nf_ct_acct_merge(ct, ctinfo, loser_ct); + nf_conntrack_put(&loser_ct->ct_general); /* Assign conntrack already in hashes to this skbuff. Don't * modify skb->nfctinfo to ensure consistent stateful filtering. */ @@ -1288,7 +1291,7 @@ unsigned int nf_conntrack_in(struct net *net, u_int8_t pf, unsigned int hooknum, struct sk_buff *skb) { - struct nf_conn *ct, *tmpl = NULL; + struct nf_conn *ct, *tmpl; enum ip_conntrack_info ctinfo; struct nf_conntrack_l3proto *l3proto; struct nf_conntrack_l4proto *l4proto; @@ -1298,9 +1301,9 @@ nf_conntrack_in(struct net *net, u_int8_t pf, unsigned int hooknum, int set_reply = 0; int ret; - if (skb->nfct) { + tmpl = nf_ct_get(skb, &ctinfo); + if (tmpl) { /* Previously seen (loopback or untracked)? Ignore. */ - tmpl = (struct nf_conn *)skb->nfct; if (!nf_ct_is_template(tmpl)) { NF_CT_STAT_INC_ATOMIC(net, ignore); return NF_ACCEPT; @@ -1364,7 +1367,7 @@ repeat: /* Invalid: inverse of the return code tells * the netfilter core what to do */ pr_debug("nf_conntrack_in: Can't track with proto module\n"); - nf_conntrack_put(skb->nfct); + nf_conntrack_put(&ct->ct_general); skb->nfct = NULL; NF_CT_STAT_INC_ATOMIC(net, invalid); if (ret == -NF_DROP)