From: Rafael J. Wysocki Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 15:35:49 +0000 (+0100) Subject: x86: CPU: Fix up "cpu MHz" in /proc/cpuinfo X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=941f5f0f6ef5338814145cf2b813cf1f98873e2f;p=GitHub%2FLineageOS%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git x86: CPU: Fix up "cpu MHz" in /proc/cpuinfo Commit 890da9cf0983 (Revert "x86: do not use cpufreq_quick_get() for /proc/cpuinfo "cpu MHz"") is not sufficient to restore the previous behavior of "cpu MHz" in /proc/cpuinfo on x86 due to some changes made after the commit it has reverted. To address this, make the code in question use arch_freq_get_on_cpu() which also is used by cpufreq for reporting the current frequency of CPUs and since that function doesn't really depend on cpufreq in any way, drop the CONFIG_CPU_FREQ dependency for the object file containing it. Also refactor arch_freq_get_on_cpu() somewhat to avoid IPIs and return cached values right away if it is called very often over a short time (to prevent user space from triggering IPI storms through it). Fixes: 890da9cf0983 (Revert "x86: do not use cpufreq_quick_get() for /proc/cpuinfo "cpu MHz"") Cc: stable@kernel.org # 4.13 - together with 890da9cf0983 Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile index c60922a66385..236999c54edc 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ obj-y += common.o obj-y += rdrand.o obj-y += match.o obj-y += bugs.o -obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ) += aperfmperf.o +obj-y += aperfmperf.o obj-$(CONFIG_PROC_FS) += proc.o obj-$(CONFIG_X86_FEATURE_NAMES) += capflags.o powerflags.o diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c index 0ee83321a313..957813e0180d 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c @@ -42,10 +42,6 @@ static void aperfmperf_snapshot_khz(void *dummy) s64 time_delta = ktime_ms_delta(now, s->time); unsigned long flags; - /* Don't bother re-computing within the cache threshold time. */ - if (time_delta < APERFMPERF_CACHE_THRESHOLD_MS) - return; - local_irq_save(flags); rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_APERF, aperf); rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MPERF, mperf); @@ -74,6 +70,7 @@ static void aperfmperf_snapshot_khz(void *dummy) unsigned int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu) { + s64 time_delta; unsigned int khz; if (!cpu_khz) @@ -82,6 +79,12 @@ unsigned int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu) if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_APERFMPERF)) return 0; + /* Don't bother re-computing within the cache threshold time. */ + time_delta = ktime_ms_delta(ktime_get(), per_cpu(samples.time, cpu)); + khz = per_cpu(samples.khz, cpu); + if (khz && time_delta < APERFMPERF_CACHE_THRESHOLD_MS) + return khz; + smp_call_function_single(cpu, aperfmperf_snapshot_khz, NULL, 1); khz = per_cpu(samples.khz, cpu); if (khz) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c index 6b7e17bf0b71..4378a729b933 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c @@ -78,8 +78,10 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m, void *v) seq_printf(m, "microcode\t: 0x%x\n", c->microcode); if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_TSC)) { - unsigned int freq = cpufreq_quick_get(cpu); + unsigned int freq = arch_freq_get_on_cpu(cpu); + if (!freq) + freq = cpufreq_quick_get(cpu); if (!freq) freq = cpu_khz; seq_printf(m, "cpu MHz\t\t: %u.%03u\n",