From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:50:07 +0000 (-0700)
Subject: sysctl: fix false positives when PROC_SYSCTL=n
X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=8c85dd8730bfb696e691145335f884c7baef8277;p=GitHub%2Fmoto-9609%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git

sysctl: fix false positives when PROC_SYSCTL=n

Having ->procname but not ->proc_handler is valid when PROC_SYSCTL=n,
people use such combination to reduce ifdefs with non-standard handlers.

Addresses http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14408

Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Peter Teoh <htmldeveloper@gmail.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---

diff --git a/kernel/sysctl_check.c b/kernel/sysctl_check.c
index b38423ca711a..b6e7aaea4604 100644
--- a/kernel/sysctl_check.c
+++ b/kernel/sysctl_check.c
@@ -1521,7 +1521,7 @@ int sysctl_check_table(struct nsproxy *namespaces, struct ctl_table *table)
 			if (!table->ctl_name && table->strategy)
 				set_fail(&fail, table, "Strategy without ctl_name");
 #endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
+#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL
 			if (table->procname && !table->proc_handler)
 				set_fail(&fail, table, "No proc_handler");
 #endif