From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 21:20:31 +0000 (-0700)
Subject: mm: memcontrol: clarify the uncharge_list() loop
X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=8b5926560fafe80fe764af2aade152d490a96546;p=GitHub%2FLineageOS%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git

mm: memcontrol: clarify the uncharge_list() loop

uncharge_list() does an unusual list walk because the function can take
regular lists with dedicated list_heads as well as singleton lists where
a single page is passed via the page->lru list node.

This can sometimes lead to confusion as well as suggestions to replace
the loop with a list_for_each_entry(), which wouldn't work.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 8614e0d750e5..fa7bf354ae32 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -5420,6 +5420,10 @@ static void uncharge_list(struct list_head *page_list)
 	struct list_head *next;
 	struct page *page;
 
+	/*
+	 * Note that the list can be a single page->lru; hence the
+	 * do-while loop instead of a simple list_for_each_entry().
+	 */
 	next = page_list->next;
 	do {
 		unsigned int nr_pages = 1;