From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 23:54:34 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: macvtap: do not add self to waitqueue if doing a nonblock read
X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=89cee917deb5bf0dc9da269a38622588d06cb6be;p=GitHub%2Fmoto-9609%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git

macvtap: do not add self to waitqueue if doing a nonblock read

There's no need to add self to waitqueue if doing a nonblock read. This could
help to avoid the spinlock contention.

Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
---

diff --git a/drivers/net/macvtap.c b/drivers/net/macvtap.c
index 5e485e307424..8949631c080c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/macvtap.c
+++ b/drivers/net/macvtap.c
@@ -845,7 +845,9 @@ static ssize_t macvtap_do_read(struct macvtap_queue *q, struct kiocb *iocb,
 	ssize_t ret = 0;
 
 	while (len) {
-		prepare_to_wait(sk_sleep(&q->sk), &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+		if (!noblock)
+			prepare_to_wait(sk_sleep(&q->sk), &wait,
+					TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
 
 		/* Read frames from the queue */
 		skb = skb_dequeue(&q->sk.sk_receive_queue);
@@ -867,7 +869,8 @@ static ssize_t macvtap_do_read(struct macvtap_queue *q, struct kiocb *iocb,
 		break;
 	}
 
-	finish_wait(sk_sleep(&q->sk), &wait);
+	if (!noblock)
+		finish_wait(sk_sleep(&q->sk), &wait);
 	return ret;
 }