From: Mark Rutland Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 22:55:23 +0000 (-0700) Subject: mm/slub: fix lockups on PREEMPT && !SMP kernels X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=859b7a0e89120505c304d7afbbe90325abaa0a6b;p=GitHub%2Fmoto-9609%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git mm/slub: fix lockups on PREEMPT && !SMP kernels Commit 9aabf810a67c ("mm/slub: optimize alloc/free fastpath by removing preemption on/off") introduced an occasional hang for kernels built with CONFIG_PREEMPT && !CONFIG_SMP. The problem is the following loop the patch introduced to slab_alloc_node and slab_free: do { tid = this_cpu_read(s->cpu_slab->tid); c = raw_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab); } while (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT) && unlikely(tid != c->tid)); GCC 4.9 has been observed to hoist the load of c and c->tid above the loop for !SMP kernels (as in this case raw_cpu_ptr(x) is compile-time constant and does not force a reload). On arm64 the generated assembly looks like: ldr x4, [x0,#8] loop: ldr x1, [x0,#8] cmp x1, x4 b.ne loop If the thread is preempted between the load of c->tid (into x1) and tid (into x4), and an allocation or free occurs in another thread (bumping the cpu_slab's tid), the thread will be stuck in the loop until s->cpu_slab->tid wraps, which may be forever in the absence of allocations/frees on the same CPU. This patch changes the loop condition to access c->tid with READ_ONCE. This ensures that the value is reloaded even when the compiler would otherwise assume it could cache the value, and also ensures that the load will not be torn. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland Cc: Catalin Marinas Acked-by: Christoph Lameter Cc: David Rientjes Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer Cc: Joonsoo Kim Cc: Pekka Enberg Cc: Steve Capper Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c index 6832c4eab104..82c473780c91 100644 --- a/mm/slub.c +++ b/mm/slub.c @@ -2449,7 +2449,8 @@ redo: do { tid = this_cpu_read(s->cpu_slab->tid); c = raw_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab); - } while (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT) && unlikely(tid != c->tid)); + } while (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT) && + unlikely(tid != READ_ONCE(c->tid))); /* * Irqless object alloc/free algorithm used here depends on sequence @@ -2718,7 +2719,8 @@ redo: do { tid = this_cpu_read(s->cpu_slab->tid); c = raw_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab); - } while (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT) && unlikely(tid != c->tid)); + } while (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT) && + unlikely(tid != READ_ONCE(c->tid))); /* Same with comment on barrier() in slab_alloc_node() */ barrier();