From: David Hildenbrand Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 11:46:45 +0000 (+0100) Subject: KVM: s390: consider epoch index on TOD clock syncs X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=81a158d21498a6d30175d1d7fc49420a5f6f09f9;p=GitHub%2Fmoto-9609%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git KVM: s390: consider epoch index on TOD clock syncs commit 1575767ef3cf5326701d2ae3075b7732cbc855e4 upstream. For now, we don't take care of over/underflows. Especially underflows are critical: Assume the epoch is currently 0 and we get a sync request for delta=1, meaning the TOD is moved forward by 1 and we have to fix it up by subtracting 1 from the epoch. Right now, this will leave the epoch index untouched, resulting in epoch=-1, epoch_idx=0, which is wrong. We have to take care of over and underflows, also for the VSIE case. So let's factor out calculation into a separate function. Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand Message-Id: <20180207114647.6220-5-david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger Fixes: 8fa1696ea781 ("KVM: s390: Multiple Epoch Facility support") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger [use u8 for idx] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c index 085e73af5610..f4f12ecd0cec 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c @@ -169,6 +169,28 @@ int kvm_arch_hardware_enable(void) static void kvm_gmap_notifier(struct gmap *gmap, unsigned long start, unsigned long end); +static void kvm_clock_sync_scb(struct kvm_s390_sie_block *scb, u64 delta) +{ + u8 delta_idx = 0; + + /* + * The TOD jumps by delta, we have to compensate this by adding + * -delta to the epoch. + */ + delta = -delta; + + /* sign-extension - we're adding to signed values below */ + if ((s64)delta < 0) + delta_idx = -1; + + scb->epoch += delta; + if (scb->ecd & ECD_MEF) { + scb->epdx += delta_idx; + if (scb->epoch < delta) + scb->epdx += 1; + } +} + /* * This callback is executed during stop_machine(). All CPUs are therefore * temporarily stopped. In order not to change guest behavior, we have to @@ -184,13 +206,17 @@ static int kvm_clock_sync(struct notifier_block *notifier, unsigned long val, unsigned long long *delta = v; list_for_each_entry(kvm, &vm_list, vm_list) { - kvm->arch.epoch -= *delta; kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) { - vcpu->arch.sie_block->epoch -= *delta; + kvm_clock_sync_scb(vcpu->arch.sie_block, *delta); + if (i == 0) { + kvm->arch.epoch = vcpu->arch.sie_block->epoch; + kvm->arch.epdx = vcpu->arch.sie_block->epdx; + } if (vcpu->arch.cputm_enabled) vcpu->arch.cputm_start += *delta; if (vcpu->arch.vsie_block) - vcpu->arch.vsie_block->epoch -= *delta; + kvm_clock_sync_scb(vcpu->arch.vsie_block, + *delta); } } return NOTIFY_OK;