From: Chris Wilson Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 23:57:38 +0000 (-0700) Subject: mm/vmalloc: keep a separate lazy-free list X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=80c4bd7a5e4368b680e0aeb57050a1b06eb573d8;p=GitHub%2Fmoto-9609%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git mm/vmalloc: keep a separate lazy-free list When mixing lots of vmallocs and set_memory_*() (which calls vm_unmap_aliases()) I encountered situations where the performance degraded severely due to the walking of the entire vmap_area list each invocation. One simple improvement is to add the lazily freed vmap_area to a separate lockless free list, such that we then avoid having to walk the full list on each purge. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Reviewed-by: Roman Pen Cc: Joonas Lahtinen Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin Cc: Daniel Vetter Cc: David Rientjes Cc: Joonsoo Kim Cc: Roman Pen Cc: Mel Gorman Cc: Toshi Kani Cc: Shawn Lin Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- diff --git a/include/linux/vmalloc.h b/include/linux/vmalloc.h index d1f1d338af20..957adb741b6f 100644 --- a/include/linux/vmalloc.h +++ b/include/linux/vmalloc.h @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include /* pgprot_t */ #include @@ -44,7 +45,7 @@ struct vmap_area { unsigned long flags; struct rb_node rb_node; /* address sorted rbtree */ struct list_head list; /* address sorted list */ - struct list_head purge_list; /* "lazy purge" list */ + struct llist_node purge_list; /* "lazy purge" list */ struct vm_struct *vm; struct rcu_head rcu_head; }; diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c index ae7d20b447ff..6e3291882739 100644 --- a/mm/vmalloc.c +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c @@ -274,13 +274,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(vmalloc_to_pfn); /*** Global kva allocator ***/ -#define VM_LAZY_FREE 0x01 -#define VM_LAZY_FREEING 0x02 #define VM_VM_AREA 0x04 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(vmap_area_lock); /* Export for kexec only */ LIST_HEAD(vmap_area_list); +static LLIST_HEAD(vmap_purge_list); static struct rb_root vmap_area_root = RB_ROOT; /* The vmap cache globals are protected by vmap_area_lock */ @@ -601,7 +600,7 @@ static void __purge_vmap_area_lazy(unsigned long *start, unsigned long *end, int sync, int force_flush) { static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(purge_lock); - LIST_HEAD(valist); + struct llist_node *valist; struct vmap_area *va; struct vmap_area *n_va; int nr = 0; @@ -620,20 +619,14 @@ static void __purge_vmap_area_lazy(unsigned long *start, unsigned long *end, if (sync) purge_fragmented_blocks_allcpus(); - rcu_read_lock(); - list_for_each_entry_rcu(va, &vmap_area_list, list) { - if (va->flags & VM_LAZY_FREE) { - if (va->va_start < *start) - *start = va->va_start; - if (va->va_end > *end) - *end = va->va_end; - nr += (va->va_end - va->va_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT; - list_add_tail(&va->purge_list, &valist); - va->flags |= VM_LAZY_FREEING; - va->flags &= ~VM_LAZY_FREE; - } + valist = llist_del_all(&vmap_purge_list); + llist_for_each_entry(va, valist, purge_list) { + if (va->va_start < *start) + *start = va->va_start; + if (va->va_end > *end) + *end = va->va_end; + nr += (va->va_end - va->va_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT; } - rcu_read_unlock(); if (nr) atomic_sub(nr, &vmap_lazy_nr); @@ -643,7 +636,7 @@ static void __purge_vmap_area_lazy(unsigned long *start, unsigned long *end, if (nr) { spin_lock(&vmap_area_lock); - list_for_each_entry_safe(va, n_va, &valist, purge_list) + llist_for_each_entry_safe(va, n_va, valist, purge_list) __free_vmap_area(va); spin_unlock(&vmap_area_lock); } @@ -678,9 +671,15 @@ static void purge_vmap_area_lazy(void) */ static void free_vmap_area_noflush(struct vmap_area *va) { - va->flags |= VM_LAZY_FREE; - atomic_add((va->va_end - va->va_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT, &vmap_lazy_nr); - if (unlikely(atomic_read(&vmap_lazy_nr) > lazy_max_pages())) + int nr_lazy; + + nr_lazy = atomic_add_return((va->va_end - va->va_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT, + &vmap_lazy_nr); + + /* After this point, we may free va at any time */ + llist_add(&va->purge_list, &vmap_purge_list); + + if (unlikely(nr_lazy > lazy_max_pages())) try_purge_vmap_area_lazy(); }