From: Rasmus Villemoes Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 11:27:51 +0000 (+0200) Subject: cxl: Add explicit precision specifiers X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=80c394fab89649585089f5bd5013f2d99e5756ef;p=GitHub%2FLineageOS%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git cxl: Add explicit precision specifiers C99 says that a precision given as simply '.' with no following digits or * should be interpreted as 0. The kernel's printf implementation, however, treats this case as if the precision was omitted. C99 also says that if both the precision and value are 0, no digits should be printed. Even if the kernel followed C99 to the letter, I don't think that would be particularly useful in these cases. For consistency with most other format strings in the file, use an explicit precision of 16 and add a 0x prefix. Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman --- diff --git a/drivers/misc/cxl/irq.c b/drivers/misc/cxl/irq.c index 680cd263436d..2b64bb43b304 100644 --- a/drivers/misc/cxl/irq.c +++ b/drivers/misc/cxl/irq.c @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ static irqreturn_t cxl_irq(int irq, void *data, struct cxl_irq_info *irq_info) if (dsisr & CXL_PSL_DSISR_An_PE) return handle_psl_slice_error(ctx, dsisr, irq_info->errstat); if (dsisr & CXL_PSL_DSISR_An_AE) { - pr_devel("CXL interrupt: AFU Error %.llx\n", irq_info->afu_err); + pr_devel("CXL interrupt: AFU Error 0x%.16llx\n", irq_info->afu_err); if (ctx->pending_afu_err) { /* @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ static irqreturn_t cxl_irq(int irq, void *data, struct cxl_irq_info *irq_info) * probably best that we log them somewhere: */ dev_err_ratelimited(&ctx->afu->dev, "CXL AFU Error " - "undelivered to pe %i: %.llx\n", + "undelivered to pe %i: 0x%.16llx\n", ctx->pe, irq_info->afu_err); } else { spin_lock(&ctx->lock);