From: Huang Shijie Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 09:29:07 +0000 (+0800) Subject: mtd: gpmi: imx6: fix the wrong method for checking ready/busy X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=7caa4fd29068cccaa7be20914af6d23f261be3eb;p=GitHub%2FLineageOS%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git mtd: gpmi: imx6: fix the wrong method for checking ready/busy In the imx6, all the ready/busy pins are binding togeter. So we should always check the ready/busy pin of the chip 0. In the other word, when the CS1 is enabled, we should also check the ready/busy of chip 0; if we check the ready/busy of chip 1, we will get the wrong result. Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie Signed-off-by: Brian Norris --- diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-lib.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-lib.c index 7d56d87599c0..aaced29727fb 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-lib.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-lib.c @@ -1079,6 +1079,13 @@ int gpmi_is_ready(struct gpmi_nand_data *this, unsigned chip) mask = MX23_BM_GPMI_DEBUG_READY0 << chip; reg = readl(r->gpmi_regs + HW_GPMI_DEBUG); } else if (GPMI_IS_MX28(this) || GPMI_IS_MX6Q(this)) { + /* + * In the imx6, all the ready/busy pins are bound + * together. So we only need to check chip 0. + */ + if (GPMI_IS_MX6Q(this)) + chip = 0; + /* MX28 shares the same R/B register as MX6Q. */ mask = MX28_BF_GPMI_STAT_READY_BUSY(1 << chip); reg = readl(r->gpmi_regs + HW_GPMI_STAT);