From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2011 16:53:20 +0000 (-0700)
Subject: vfs: rename 'do_follow_link' to 'should_follow_link'
X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=7813b94a54987571082ff19e9d87eabbfec23b4e;p=GitHub%2Fmoto-9609%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git

vfs: rename 'do_follow_link' to 'should_follow_link'

Al points out that the do_follow_link() helper function really is
misnamed - it's about whether we should try to follow a symlink or not,
not about actually doing the following.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---

diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
index fc13609a354a..2826db35dc25 100644
--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@ -1267,7 +1267,7 @@ static void terminate_walk(struct nameidata *nd)
  * so we keep a cache of "no, this doesn't need follow_link"
  * for the common case.
  */
-static inline int do_follow_link(struct inode *inode, int follow)
+static inline int should_follow_link(struct inode *inode, int follow)
 {
 	if (unlikely(!(inode->i_opflags & IOP_NOFOLLOW))) {
 		if (likely(inode->i_op->follow_link))
@@ -1303,7 +1303,7 @@ static inline int walk_component(struct nameidata *nd, struct path *path,
 		terminate_walk(nd);
 		return -ENOENT;
 	}
-	if (do_follow_link(inode, follow)) {
+	if (should_follow_link(inode, follow)) {
 		if (nd->flags & LOOKUP_RCU) {
 			if (unlikely(unlazy_walk(nd, path->dentry))) {
 				terminate_walk(nd);