From: Viresh Kumar Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:26:07 +0000 (+0530) Subject: cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=776b57be6581528125a076cbae5c0b75c50909f5;p=GitHub%2Fmoto-9609%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() Lets use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() instead of calling cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() and cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(). Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c index d2c3253e015e..d9932111a681 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c @@ -837,7 +837,7 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) data->freq_table[valid_states].frequency = CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; perf->state = 0; - result = cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(policy, data->freq_table); + result = cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(policy, data->freq_table); if (result) goto err_freqfree; @@ -868,8 +868,6 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) (u32) perf->states[i].power, (u32) perf->states[i].transition_latency); - cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(data->freq_table, policy->cpu); - /* * the first call to ->target() should result in us actually * writing something to the appropriate registers.