From: Chris Wilson Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 17:32:43 +0000 (+0000) Subject: drm/i915: Improve handling of overlapping objects X-Git-Tag: MMI-PSA29.97-13-9~7427^2~45^2~765 X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=768e159f433c97f5221a3662217de5a1cb3b9b95;p=GitHub%2FMotorolaMobilityLLC%2Fkernel-slsi.git drm/i915: Improve handling of overlapping objects The generic interval tree we use to speed up range invalidation is an augmented rbtree that can report all overlapping intervals for a given range. Therefore we do not need to degrade to a linear list if we find overlapping objects. Oops. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin Cc: Michał Winiarski Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453397563-2848-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Reviewed-by: Michał Winiarski Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c index 19fb0bddc1cd..74a4d1714879 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c @@ -49,21 +49,18 @@ struct i915_mmu_notifier { struct hlist_node node; struct mmu_notifier mn; struct rb_root objects; - struct list_head linear; - bool has_linear; }; struct i915_mmu_object { struct i915_mmu_notifier *mn; + struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj; struct interval_tree_node it; struct list_head link; - struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj; struct work_struct work; - bool active; - bool is_linear; + bool attached; }; -static void __cancel_userptr__worker(struct work_struct *work) +static void cancel_userptr(struct work_struct *work) { struct i915_mmu_object *mo = container_of(work, typeof(*mo), work); struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = mo->obj; @@ -94,24 +91,22 @@ static void __cancel_userptr__worker(struct work_struct *work) mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex); } -static unsigned long cancel_userptr(struct i915_mmu_object *mo) +static void add_object(struct i915_mmu_object *mo) { - unsigned long end = mo->obj->userptr.ptr + mo->obj->base.size; - - /* The mmu_object is released late when destroying the - * GEM object so it is entirely possible to gain a - * reference on an object in the process of being freed - * since our serialisation is via the spinlock and not - * the struct_mutex - and consequently use it after it - * is freed and then double free it. - */ - if (mo->active && kref_get_unless_zero(&mo->obj->base.refcount)) { - schedule_work(&mo->work); - /* only schedule one work packet to avoid the refleak */ - mo->active = false; - } + if (mo->attached) + return; + + interval_tree_insert(&mo->it, &mo->mn->objects); + mo->attached = true; +} - return end; +static void del_object(struct i915_mmu_object *mo) +{ + if (!mo->attached) + return; + + interval_tree_remove(&mo->it, &mo->mn->objects); + mo->attached = false; } static void i915_gem_userptr_mn_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *_mn, @@ -122,28 +117,36 @@ static void i915_gem_userptr_mn_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *_mn, struct i915_mmu_notifier *mn = container_of(_mn, struct i915_mmu_notifier, mn); struct i915_mmu_object *mo; + struct interval_tree_node *it; + LIST_HEAD(cancelled); + + if (RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&mn->objects)) + return; /* interval ranges are inclusive, but invalidate range is exclusive */ end--; spin_lock(&mn->lock); - if (mn->has_linear) { - list_for_each_entry(mo, &mn->linear, link) { - if (mo->it.last < start || mo->it.start > end) - continue; - - cancel_userptr(mo); - } - } else { - struct interval_tree_node *it; + it = interval_tree_iter_first(&mn->objects, start, end); + while (it) { + /* The mmu_object is released late when destroying the + * GEM object so it is entirely possible to gain a + * reference on an object in the process of being freed + * since our serialisation is via the spinlock and not + * the struct_mutex - and consequently use it after it + * is freed and then double free it. To prevent that + * use-after-free we only acquire a reference on the + * object if it is not in the process of being destroyed. + */ + mo = container_of(it, struct i915_mmu_object, it); + if (kref_get_unless_zero(&mo->obj->base.refcount)) + schedule_work(&mo->work); - it = interval_tree_iter_first(&mn->objects, start, end); - while (it) { - mo = container_of(it, struct i915_mmu_object, it); - start = cancel_userptr(mo); - it = interval_tree_iter_next(it, start, end); - } + list_add(&mo->link, &cancelled); + it = interval_tree_iter_next(it, start, end); } + list_for_each_entry(mo, &cancelled, link) + del_object(mo); spin_unlock(&mn->lock); } @@ -164,8 +167,6 @@ i915_mmu_notifier_create(struct mm_struct *mm) spin_lock_init(&mn->lock); mn->mn.ops = &i915_gem_userptr_notifier; mn->objects = RB_ROOT; - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mn->linear); - mn->has_linear = false; /* Protected by mmap_sem (write-lock) */ ret = __mmu_notifier_register(&mn->mn, mm); @@ -177,85 +178,6 @@ i915_mmu_notifier_create(struct mm_struct *mm) return mn; } -static int -i915_mmu_notifier_add(struct drm_device *dev, - struct i915_mmu_notifier *mn, - struct i915_mmu_object *mo) -{ - struct interval_tree_node *it; - int ret = 0; - - /* By this point we have already done a lot of expensive setup that - * we do not want to repeat just because the caller (e.g. X) has a - * signal pending (and partly because of that expensive setup, X - * using an interrupt timer is likely to get stuck in an EINTR loop). - */ - mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex); - - /* Make sure we drop the final active reference (and thereby - * remove the objects from the interval tree) before we do - * the check for overlapping objects. - */ - i915_gem_retire_requests(dev); - - spin_lock(&mn->lock); - it = interval_tree_iter_first(&mn->objects, - mo->it.start, mo->it.last); - if (it) { - struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj; - - /* We only need to check the first object in the range as it - * either has cancelled gup work queued and we need to - * return back to the user to give time for the gup-workers - * to flush their object references upon which the object will - * be removed from the interval-tree, or the the range is - * still in use by another client and the overlap is invalid. - * - * If we do have an overlap, we cannot use the interval tree - * for fast range invalidation. - */ - - obj = container_of(it, struct i915_mmu_object, it)->obj; - if (!obj->userptr.workers) - mn->has_linear = mo->is_linear = true; - else - ret = -EAGAIN; - } else - interval_tree_insert(&mo->it, &mn->objects); - - if (ret == 0) - list_add(&mo->link, &mn->linear); - - spin_unlock(&mn->lock); - mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex); - - return ret; -} - -static bool i915_mmu_notifier_has_linear(struct i915_mmu_notifier *mn) -{ - struct i915_mmu_object *mo; - - list_for_each_entry(mo, &mn->linear, link) - if (mo->is_linear) - return true; - - return false; -} - -static void -i915_mmu_notifier_del(struct i915_mmu_notifier *mn, - struct i915_mmu_object *mo) -{ - spin_lock(&mn->lock); - list_del(&mo->link); - if (mo->is_linear) - mn->has_linear = i915_mmu_notifier_has_linear(mn); - else - interval_tree_remove(&mo->it, &mn->objects); - spin_unlock(&mn->lock); -} - static void i915_gem_userptr_release__mmu_notifier(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj) { @@ -265,7 +187,9 @@ i915_gem_userptr_release__mmu_notifier(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj) if (mo == NULL) return; - i915_mmu_notifier_del(mo->mn, mo); + spin_lock(&mo->mn->lock); + del_object(mo); + spin_unlock(&mo->mn->lock); kfree(mo); obj->userptr.mmu_object = NULL; @@ -299,7 +223,6 @@ i915_gem_userptr_init__mmu_notifier(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, { struct i915_mmu_notifier *mn; struct i915_mmu_object *mo; - int ret; if (flags & I915_USERPTR_UNSYNCHRONIZED) return capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) ? 0 : -EPERM; @@ -316,16 +239,10 @@ i915_gem_userptr_init__mmu_notifier(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, return -ENOMEM; mo->mn = mn; - mo->it.start = obj->userptr.ptr; - mo->it.last = mo->it.start + obj->base.size - 1; mo->obj = obj; - INIT_WORK(&mo->work, __cancel_userptr__worker); - - ret = i915_mmu_notifier_add(obj->base.dev, mn, mo); - if (ret) { - kfree(mo); - return ret; - } + mo->it.start = obj->userptr.ptr; + mo->it.last = obj->userptr.ptr + obj->base.size - 1; + INIT_WORK(&mo->work, cancel_userptr); obj->userptr.mmu_object = mo; return 0; @@ -552,8 +469,10 @@ __i915_gem_userptr_set_active(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, /* In order to serialise get_pages with an outstanding * cancel_userptr, we must drop the struct_mutex and try again. */ - if (!value || !work_pending(&obj->userptr.mmu_object->work)) - obj->userptr.mmu_object->active = value; + if (!value) + del_object(obj->userptr.mmu_object); + else if (!work_pending(&obj->userptr.mmu_object->work)) + add_object(obj->userptr.mmu_object); else ret = -EAGAIN; spin_unlock(&obj->userptr.mmu_object->mn->lock);