From: Lee Schermerhorn Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 08:24:51 +0000 (-0700) Subject: Mem Policy: add MPOL_F_MEMS_ALLOWED get_mempolicy() flag X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=754af6f5a85fcd1ecb456851d20c65e4c6ce10ab;p=GitHub%2FLineageOS%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git Mem Policy: add MPOL_F_MEMS_ALLOWED get_mempolicy() flag Allow an application to query the memories allowed by its context. Updated numa_memory_policy.txt to mention that applications can use this to obtain allowed memories for constructing valid policies. TODO: update out-of-tree libnuma wrapper[s], or maybe add a new wrapper--e.g., numa_get_mems_allowed() ? Also, update numa syscall man pages. Tested with memtoy V>=0.13. Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn Acked-by: Christoph Lameter Cc: Andi Kleen Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- diff --git a/Documentation/vm/numa_memory_policy.txt b/Documentation/vm/numa_memory_policy.txt index 8242f52d0f22..dd4986497996 100644 --- a/Documentation/vm/numa_memory_policy.txt +++ b/Documentation/vm/numa_memory_policy.txt @@ -302,31 +302,30 @@ MEMORY POLICIES AND CPUSETS Memory policies work within cpusets as described above. For memory policies that require a node or set of nodes, the nodes are restricted to the set of -nodes whose memories are allowed by the cpuset constraints. If the -intersection of the set of nodes specified for the policy and the set of nodes -allowed by the cpuset is the empty set, the policy is considered invalid and -cannot be installed. +nodes whose memories are allowed by the cpuset constraints. If the nodemask +specified for the policy contains nodes that are not allowed by the cpuset, or +the intersection of the set of nodes specified for the policy and the set of +nodes with memory is the empty set, the policy is considered invalid +and cannot be installed. The interaction of memory policies and cpusets can be problematic for a couple of reasons: -1) the memory policy APIs take physical node id's as arguments. However, the - memory policy APIs do not provide a way to determine what nodes are valid - in the context where the application is running. An application MAY consult - the cpuset file system [directly or via an out of tree, and not generally - available, libcpuset API] to obtain this information, but then the - application must be aware that it is running in a cpuset and use what are - intended primarily as administrative APIs. - - However, as long as the policy specifies at least one node that is valid - in the controlling cpuset, the policy can be used. +1) the memory policy APIs take physical node id's as arguments. As mentioned + above, it is illegal to specify nodes that are not allowed in the cpuset. + The application must query the allowed nodes using the get_mempolicy() + API with the MPOL_F_MEMS_ALLOWED flag to determine the allowed nodes and + restrict itself to those nodes. However, the resources available to a + cpuset can be changed by the system administrator, or a workload manager + application, at any time. So, a task may still get errors attempting to + specify policy nodes, and must query the allowed memories again. 2) when tasks in two cpusets share access to a memory region, such as shared memory segments created by shmget() of mmap() with the MAP_ANONYMOUS and MAP_SHARED flags, and any of the tasks install shared policy on the region, only nodes whose memories are allowed in both cpusets may be used in the - policies. Again, obtaining this information requires "stepping outside" - the memory policy APIs, as well as knowing in what cpusets other task might - be attaching to the shared region, to use the cpuset information. + policies. Obtaining this information requires "stepping outside" the + memory policy APIs to use the cpuset information and requires that one + know in what cpusets other task might be attaching to the shared region. Furthermore, if the cpusets' allowed memory sets are disjoint, "local" allocation is the only valid policy. diff --git a/include/linux/mempolicy.h b/include/linux/mempolicy.h index a020eb2d4e2a..7e9698ec839b 100644 --- a/include/linux/mempolicy.h +++ b/include/linux/mempolicy.h @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ /* Flags for get_mem_policy */ #define MPOL_F_NODE (1<<0) /* return next IL mode instead of node mask */ #define MPOL_F_ADDR (1<<1) /* look up vma using address */ +#define MPOL_F_MEMS_ALLOWED (1<<2) /* return allowed memories */ /* Flags for mbind */ #define MPOL_MF_STRICT (1<<0) /* Verify existing pages in the mapping */ diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c index 3a45b7dd0a09..ccbdb22147bb 100644 --- a/mm/mempolicy.c +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c @@ -526,8 +526,18 @@ long do_get_mempolicy(int *policy, nodemask_t *nmask, struct mempolicy *pol = current->mempolicy; cpuset_update_task_memory_state(); - if (flags & ~(unsigned long)(MPOL_F_NODE|MPOL_F_ADDR)) + if (flags & + ~(unsigned long)(MPOL_F_NODE|MPOL_F_ADDR|MPOL_F_MEMS_ALLOWED)) return -EINVAL; + + if (flags & MPOL_F_MEMS_ALLOWED) { + if (flags & (MPOL_F_NODE|MPOL_F_ADDR)) + return -EINVAL; + *policy = 0; /* just so it's initialized */ + *nmask = cpuset_current_mems_allowed; + return 0; + } + if (flags & MPOL_F_ADDR) { down_read(&mm->mmap_sem); vma = find_vma_intersection(mm, addr, addr+1);