From: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:35:06 +0000 (+0200) Subject: Staging: ipack/bridges/tpci200: fix the uninstall the ipack device X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=7273b88ebfc1b3ea5387e37fae8b1d77e59e169f;p=GitHub%2FLineageOS%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git Staging: ipack/bridges/tpci200: fix the uninstall the ipack device Using the call to the ipack_device_unregister() function to avoid the strange way it was doing, as the device model will take care of calling the bus's .remove function when a device is being unregistered. Signed-off-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- diff --git a/drivers/staging/ipack/bridges/tpci200.c b/drivers/staging/ipack/bridges/tpci200.c index b92814067061..77e6392fee08 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/ipack/bridges/tpci200.c +++ b/drivers/staging/ipack/bridges/tpci200.c @@ -385,7 +385,6 @@ static int tpci200_slot_unregister(struct ipack_device *dev) return -ERESTARTSYS; tpci200->slots[dev->slot].dev = NULL; - ipack_device_unregister(dev); mutex_unlock(&tpci200->mutex); return 0; @@ -614,7 +613,7 @@ static void tpci200_uninstall(struct tpci200_board *tpci200) int i; for (i = 0; i < TPCI200_NB_SLOT; i++) - tpci200_slot_unregister(tpci200->slots[i].dev); + ipack_device_unregister(tpci200->slots[i].dev); tpci200_unregister(tpci200); kfree(tpci200->slots);