From: Milton Miller Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 19:29:46 +0000 (+0000) Subject: powerpc: Use bytes instead of bitops in smp ipi multiplexing X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=714542721b4a53a3ebbdd5f0619ac0f66e7df610;p=GitHub%2Fexynos8895%2Fandroid_kernel_samsung_universal8895.git powerpc: Use bytes instead of bitops in smp ipi multiplexing Since there are only 4 messages, we can replace the atomic bit set (which uses atomic load reserve and store conditional sequence) with a byte stores to seperate bytes. We still have to perform a load reserve and store conditional sequence to avoid loosing messages on reception but we can do that with a single call to xchg. The do {} while and __BIG_ENDIAN specific mask testing was chosen by looking at the generated asm code. On gcc-4.4, the bit masking becomes a simple bit mask and test of the register returned from xchg without storing and loading the value to the stack like attempts with a union of bytes and an int (or worse, loading single bit constants from the constant pool into non-voliatle registers that had to be preseved on the stack). The do {} while avoids an unconditional branch to the end of the loop to test the entry / repeat condition of a while loop and instead optimises for the expected single iteration of the loop. We have a full mb() at the beginning to cover ordering between send, ipi, and receive so we can use xchg_local and forgo the further acquire and release barriers of xchg. Signed-off-by: Milton Miller Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt --- diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c index d76f7d7929be..a8909aa50642 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ int smp_request_message_ipi(int virq, int msg) #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_SMP_MUXED_IPI struct cpu_messages { - unsigned long messages; /* current messages bits */ + int messages; /* current messages */ unsigned long data; /* data for cause ipi */ }; static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct cpu_messages, ipi_message); @@ -195,9 +195,9 @@ void smp_muxed_ipi_set_data(int cpu, unsigned long data) void smp_muxed_ipi_message_pass(int cpu, int msg) { struct cpu_messages *info = &per_cpu(ipi_message, cpu); - unsigned long *tgt = &info->messages; + char *message = (char *)&info->messages; - set_bit(msg, tgt); + message[msg] = 1; mb(); smp_ops->cause_ipi(cpu, info->data); } @@ -205,30 +205,35 @@ void smp_muxed_ipi_message_pass(int cpu, int msg) void smp_muxed_ipi_resend(void) { struct cpu_messages *info = &__get_cpu_var(ipi_message); - unsigned long *tgt = &info->messages; - if (*tgt) + if (info->messages) smp_ops->cause_ipi(smp_processor_id(), info->data); } irqreturn_t smp_ipi_demux(void) { struct cpu_messages *info = &__get_cpu_var(ipi_message); - unsigned long *tgt = &info->messages; + unsigned int all; mb(); /* order any irq clear */ - while (*tgt) { - if (test_and_clear_bit(PPC_MSG_CALL_FUNCTION, tgt)) + + do { + all = xchg_local(&info->messages, 0); + +#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN + if (all & (1 << (24 - 8 * PPC_MSG_CALL_FUNCTION))) generic_smp_call_function_interrupt(); - if (test_and_clear_bit(PPC_MSG_RESCHEDULE, tgt)) + if (all & (1 << (24 - 8 * PPC_MSG_RESCHEDULE))) reschedule_action(0, NULL); /* upcoming sched hook */ - if (test_and_clear_bit(PPC_MSG_CALL_FUNC_SINGLE, tgt)) + if (all & (1 << (24 - 8 * PPC_MSG_CALL_FUNC_SINGLE))) generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt(); -#if defined(CONFIG_DEBUGGER) || defined(CONFIG_KEXEC) - if (test_and_clear_bit(PPC_MSG_DEBUGGER_BREAK, tgt)) + if (all & (1 << (24 - 8 * PPC_MSG_DEBUGGER_BREAK))) debug_ipi_action(0, NULL); +#else +#error Unsupported ENDIAN #endif - } + } while (info->messages); + return IRQ_HANDLED; } #endif /* CONFIG_PPC_SMP_MUXED_IPI */