From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 06:37:48 +0000 (+1000)
Subject: [NEIGH] Fix add_timer race in neigh_add_timer
X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=6fb9974f49f7a6032118c5b6caa6e08e7097913e;p=GitHub%2Fmoto-9609%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git

[NEIGH] Fix add_timer race in neigh_add_timer

neigh_add_timer cannot use add_timer unconditionally.  The reason is that
by the time it has obtained the write lock someone else (e.g., neigh_update)
could have already added a new timer.

So it should only use mod_timer and deal with its return value accordingly.

This bug would have led to rare neighbour cache entry leaks.

Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
---

diff --git a/net/core/neighbour.c b/net/core/neighbour.c
index 766caa0dd930..37d8d8c29522 100644
--- a/net/core/neighbour.c
+++ b/net/core/neighbour.c
@@ -816,10 +816,10 @@ static void neigh_timer_handler(unsigned long arg)
 	}
 
 	if (neigh->nud_state & NUD_IN_TIMER) {
-		neigh_hold(neigh);
 		if (time_before(next, jiffies + HZ/2))
 			next = jiffies + HZ/2;
-		neigh_add_timer(neigh, next);
+		if (!mod_timer(&neigh->timer, next))
+			neigh_hold(neigh);
 	}
 	if (neigh->nud_state & (NUD_INCOMPLETE | NUD_PROBE)) {
 		struct sk_buff *skb = skb_peek(&neigh->arp_queue);