From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:21:03 +0000 (+0400)
Subject: coda: don't bother with find_inode_number()
X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=6b5e1223d9c3fae19b1a2acd789d9dab97de67c4;p=GitHub%2Fexynos8895%2Fandroid_kernel_samsung_universal8895.git

coda: don't bother with find_inode_number()

the fallback it's using for dcache misses is actually the
same value we would've used for inumber anyway.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---

diff --git a/fs/coda/dir.c b/fs/coda/dir.c
index 87e0ee9f4465..14a14808320c 100644
--- a/fs/coda/dir.c
+++ b/fs/coda/dir.c
@@ -487,13 +487,7 @@ static int coda_venus_readdir(struct file *coda_file, struct dir_context *ctx)
 
 		/* skip null entries */
 		if (vdir->d_fileno && name.len) {
-			/* try to look up this entry in the dcache, that way
-			 * userspace doesn't have to worry about breaking
-			 * getcwd by having mismatched inode numbers for
-			 * internal volume mountpoints. */
-			ino = find_inode_number(de, &name);
-			if (!ino) ino = vdir->d_fileno;
-
+			ino = vdir->d_fileno;
 			type = CDT2DT(vdir->d_type);
 			if (!dir_emit(ctx, name.name, name.len, ino, type))
 				break;