From: Byongho Lee Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 11:49:34 +0000 (+0900) Subject: btrfs: cleanup iterating over prop_handlers array X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=619ed39242d901339c09faa1b52dad47b0476f6f;p=GitHub%2Fmoto-9609%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git btrfs: cleanup iterating over prop_handlers array This patch eliminates the last item of prop_handlers array which is used to check end of array and instead uses ARRAY_SIZE macro. Though this is a very tiny optimization, using ARRAY_SIZE macro is a good practice to iterate array. Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Byongho Lee Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- diff --git a/fs/btrfs/props.c b/fs/btrfs/props.c index dca137b04095..f9e60231f685 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/props.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/props.c @@ -49,18 +49,16 @@ static struct prop_handler prop_handlers[] = { .extract = prop_compression_extract, .inheritable = 1 }, - { - .xattr_name = NULL - } }; void __init btrfs_props_init(void) { - struct prop_handler *p; + int i; hash_init(prop_handlers_ht); - for (p = &prop_handlers[0]; p->xattr_name; p++) { + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(prop_handlers); i++) { + struct prop_handler *p = &prop_handlers[i]; u64 h = btrfs_name_hash(p->xattr_name, strlen(p->xattr_name)); hash_add(prop_handlers_ht, &p->node, h); @@ -301,15 +299,16 @@ static int inherit_props(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct inode *inode, struct inode *parent) { - const struct prop_handler *h; struct btrfs_root *root = BTRFS_I(inode)->root; int ret; + int i; if (!test_bit(BTRFS_INODE_HAS_PROPS, &BTRFS_I(parent)->runtime_flags)) return 0; - for (h = &prop_handlers[0]; h->xattr_name; h++) { + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(prop_handlers); i++) { + const struct prop_handler *h = &prop_handlers[i]; const char *value; u64 num_bytes;