From: Colin Cross Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 23:50:11 +0000 (+0000) Subject: freezer: skip waking up tasks with PF_FREEZER_SKIP set X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=613f5d13b569859171f0896fbc73ee0bfa811fda;p=GitHub%2Fmoto-9609%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git freezer: skip waking up tasks with PF_FREEZER_SKIP set Android goes through suspend/resume very often (every few seconds when on a busy wifi network with the screen off), and a significant portion of the energy used to go in and out of suspend is spent in the freezer. If a task has called freezer_do_not_count(), don't bother waking it up. If it happens to wake up later it will call freezer_count() and immediately enter the refrigerator. Combined with patches to convert freezable helpers to use freezer_do_not_count() and convert common sites where idle userspace tasks are blocked to use the freezable helpers, this reduces the time and energy required to suspend and resume. Acked-by: Tejun Heo Acked-by: Pavel Machek Signed-off-by: Colin Cross Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- diff --git a/kernel/freezer.c b/kernel/freezer.c index c38893b0efba..8b2afc1c9df0 100644 --- a/kernel/freezer.c +++ b/kernel/freezer.c @@ -110,6 +110,18 @@ bool freeze_task(struct task_struct *p) { unsigned long flags; + /* + * This check can race with freezer_do_not_count, but worst case that + * will result in an extra wakeup being sent to the task. It does not + * race with freezer_count(), the barriers in freezer_count() and + * freezer_should_skip() ensure that either freezer_count() sees + * freezing == true in try_to_freeze() and freezes, or + * freezer_should_skip() sees !PF_FREEZE_SKIP and freezes the task + * normally. + */ + if (freezer_should_skip(p)) + return false; + spin_lock_irqsave(&freezer_lock, flags); if (!freezing(p) || frozen(p)) { spin_unlock_irqrestore(&freezer_lock, flags);