From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 21:04:01 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: reiserfs: Fix recursive lock on lchown
X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=5fe1533fda8ae005541bd418a7a8bc4fa0cda522;p=GitHub%2FLineageOS%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git

reiserfs: Fix recursive lock on lchown

On chown, reiserfs will call reiserfs_setattr() to change the owner
of the given inode, but it may also recursively call
reiserfs_setattr() to propagate the owner change to the private xattr
files for this inode.

Hence, the reiserfs lock may be acquired twice which is not wanted
as reiserfs_setattr() calls journal_begin() that is going to try to
relax the lock in order to safely acquire the journal mutex.

Using reiserfs_write_lock_once() from reiserfs_setattr() solves
the problem.

This fixes the following warning, that precedes a lockdep report.

WARNING: at fs/reiserfs/lock.c:95 reiserfs_lock_check_recursive+0x3f/0x50()
Hardware name: MS-7418
Unwanted recursive reiserfs lock!
Pid: 4189, comm: fsstress Not tainted 2.6.33-rc2-tip-atom+ #195
Call Trace:
 [<c1178bff>] ? reiserfs_lock_check_recursive+0x3f/0x50
 [<c1178bff>] ? reiserfs_lock_check_recursive+0x3f/0x50
 [<c103f7ac>] warn_slowpath_common+0x6c/0xc0
 [<c1178bff>] ? reiserfs_lock_check_recursive+0x3f/0x50
 [<c103f84b>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x2b/0x30
 [<c1178bff>] reiserfs_lock_check_recursive+0x3f/0x50
 [<c1172ae3>] do_journal_begin_r+0x83/0x350
 [<c1172f2d>] journal_begin+0x7d/0x140
 [<c106509a>] ? in_group_p+0x2a/0x30
 [<c10fda71>] ? inode_change_ok+0x91/0x140
 [<c115007d>] reiserfs_setattr+0x15d/0x2e0
 [<c10f9bf3>] ? dput+0xe3/0x140
 [<c1465adc>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x2c/0x50
 [<c117831d>] chown_one_xattr+0xd/0x10
 [<c11780a3>] reiserfs_for_each_xattr+0x113/0x2c0
 [<c1178310>] ? chown_one_xattr+0x0/0x10
 [<c14641e9>] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x2a9/0x350
 [<c117826f>] reiserfs_chown_xattrs+0x1f/0x60
 [<c106509a>] ? in_group_p+0x2a/0x30
 [<c10fda71>] ? inode_change_ok+0x91/0x140
 [<c1150046>] reiserfs_setattr+0x126/0x2e0
 [<c1177c20>] ? reiserfs_getxattr+0x0/0x90
 [<c11b0d57>] ? cap_inode_need_killpriv+0x37/0x50
 [<c10fde01>] notify_change+0x151/0x330
 [<c10e659f>] chown_common+0x6f/0x90
 [<c10e67bd>] sys_lchown+0x6d/0x80
 [<c1002ccc>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x32
---[ end trace 7c2b77224c1442fc ]---

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Cc: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---

diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/inode.c b/fs/reiserfs/inode.c
index bd615dfe4ec7..47dbfb18877a 100644
--- a/fs/reiserfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/inode.c
@@ -3052,13 +3052,14 @@ static ssize_t reiserfs_direct_IO(int rw, struct kiocb *iocb,
 int reiserfs_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr)
 {
 	struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
-	int error;
 	unsigned int ia_valid;
+	int depth;
+	int error;
 
 	/* must be turned off for recursive notify_change calls */
 	ia_valid = attr->ia_valid &= ~(ATTR_KILL_SUID|ATTR_KILL_SGID);
 
-	reiserfs_write_lock(inode->i_sb);
+	depth = reiserfs_write_lock_once(inode->i_sb);
 	if (attr->ia_valid & ATTR_SIZE) {
 		/* version 2 items will be caught by the s_maxbytes check
 		 ** done for us in vmtruncate
@@ -3149,7 +3150,8 @@ int reiserfs_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr)
 	}
 
       out:
-	reiserfs_write_unlock(inode->i_sb);
+	reiserfs_write_unlock_once(inode->i_sb, depth);
+
 	return error;
 }