From: Steven Rostedt (VMware) Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 02:45:18 +0000 (-0400) Subject: ftrace: Create separate t_func_next() to simplify the function / hash logic X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=5bd84629a7a0e2462c28ca52e213ebe27fadfee8;p=GitHub%2FLineageOS%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git ftrace: Create separate t_func_next() to simplify the function / hash logic I noticed that if I use dd to read the set_ftrace_filter file that the first hash command is repeated. # cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing # echo schedule > set_ftrace_filter # echo do_IRQ >> set_ftrace_filter # echo schedule:traceoff >> set_ftrace_filter # echo do_IRQ:traceoff >> set_ftrace_filter # cat set_ftrace_filter schedule do_IRQ schedule:traceoff:unlimited do_IRQ:traceoff:unlimited # dd if=set_ftrace_filter bs=1 schedule do_IRQ schedule:traceoff:unlimited schedule:traceoff:unlimited do_IRQ:traceoff:unlimited 98+0 records in 98+0 records out 98 bytes copied, 0.00265011 s, 37.0 kB/s This is due to the way t_start() calls t_next() as well as the seq_file calls t_next() and the state is slightly different between the two. Namely, t_start() will call t_next() with a local "pos" variable. By separating out the function listing from t_next() into its own function, we can have better control of outputting the functions and the hash of triggers. This simplifies the code. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) --- diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c index d4b18ce9ba88..aff7a2c08387 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c +++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c @@ -3154,22 +3154,12 @@ t_hash_show(struct seq_file *m, struct ftrace_iterator *iter) } static void * -t_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos) +t_func_next(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos) { struct ftrace_iterator *iter = m->private; struct dyn_ftrace *rec = NULL; - if (unlikely(ftrace_disabled)) - return NULL; - - if (iter->flags & FTRACE_ITER_HASH) - return t_hash_next(m, pos); - (*pos)++; - iter->pos = iter->func_pos = *pos; - - if (iter->flags & FTRACE_ITER_PRINTALL) - return t_hash_start(m, pos); retry: if (iter->idx >= iter->pg->index) { @@ -3192,13 +3182,40 @@ t_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos) } if (!rec) - return t_hash_start(m, pos); + return NULL; + iter->pos = iter->func_pos = *pos; iter->func = rec; return iter; } +static void * +t_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos) +{ + struct ftrace_iterator *iter = m->private; + void *ret; + + if (unlikely(ftrace_disabled)) + return NULL; + + if (iter->flags & FTRACE_ITER_HASH) + return t_hash_next(m, pos); + + if (iter->flags & FTRACE_ITER_PRINTALL) { + /* next must increment pos, and t_hash_start does not */ + (*pos)++; + return t_hash_start(m, pos); + } + + ret = t_func_next(m, pos); + + if (!ret) + return t_hash_start(m, pos); + + return ret; +} + static void reset_iter_read(struct ftrace_iterator *iter) { iter->pos = 0; @@ -3250,13 +3267,13 @@ static void *t_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos) iter->pg = ftrace_pages_start; iter->idx = 0; for (l = 0; l <= *pos; ) { - p = t_next(m, p, &l); + p = t_func_next(m, &l); if (!p) break; } if (!p) - return NULL; + return t_hash_start(m, pos); return iter; }