From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:45:26 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: xfrm6: remove unneeded NULL check in __xfrm6_output()
X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=5b11b2e4bdef20e839d90dce96c5bbeafaf9616c;p=GitHub%2Fmoto-9609%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git

xfrm6: remove unneeded NULL check in __xfrm6_output()

We don't check for NULL consistently in __xfrm6_output().  If "x" were
NULL here it would lead to an OOPs later.  I asked Steffen Klassert
about this and he suggested that we remove the NULL check.

On 10/29/11, Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com> wrote:
>> net/ipv6/xfrm6_output.c
>>    148
>>    149		if ((x && x->props.mode == XFRM_MODE_TUNNEL) &&
>>                           ^
>
> x can't be null here. It would be a bug if __xfrm6_output() is called
> without a xfrm_state attached to the skb. I think we can just remove
> this null check.

Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
---

diff --git a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_output.c b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_output.c
index 4eeff89c1aaa..8755a3079d0f 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_output.c
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ static int __xfrm6_output(struct sk_buff *skb)
 		return -EMSGSIZE;
 	}
 
-	if ((x && x->props.mode == XFRM_MODE_TUNNEL) &&
+	if (x->props.mode == XFRM_MODE_TUNNEL &&
 	    ((skb->len > mtu && !skb_is_gso(skb)) ||
 		dst_allfrag(skb_dst(skb)))) {
 			return ip6_fragment(skb, x->outer_mode->afinfo->output_finish);