From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 15:44:20 +0000 (+0400)
Subject: mac80211: Fix one more call to synchronize_rcu in atomic context.
X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=5194ee82b4aafc35b32c96db11bdacea9bf548be;p=GitHub%2FLineageOS%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git

mac80211: Fix one more call to synchronize_rcu in atomic context.

(This set applies OK without the previous one of 4 patches,
 but with some fuzz in the 7th one)

The mesh_path_node_free() does so under hashwlock.

But, this one is called
1. from mesh_path_add() after an old hash is hidden and
   synchronize_rcu() is calld
2. mesh_pathtbl_unregister(), when the module is being
   unloaded and no devices exist to mess with this hash.

So, it seems to me, that simply removing the call is OK.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
---

diff --git a/net/mac80211/mesh_pathtbl.c b/net/mac80211/mesh_pathtbl.c
index 7097ef981991..0b6c4bfe3e78 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/mesh_pathtbl.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/mesh_pathtbl.c
@@ -458,7 +458,6 @@ static void mesh_path_node_free(struct hlist_node *p, bool free_leafs)
 	struct mpath_node *node = hlist_entry(p, struct mpath_node, list);
 	mpath = node->mpath;
 	hlist_del_rcu(p);
-	synchronize_rcu();
 	if (free_leafs)
 		kfree(mpath);
 	kfree(node);