From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 02:22:30 +0000 (-0300) Subject: perf test bpf: Use epoll_wait() instead of epoll_pwait() X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=4ffde492461d5c2111bf64366b633e554b4aa925;p=GitHub%2Fmoto-9609%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git perf test bpf: Use epoll_wait() instead of epoll_pwait() The prototype for epoll_wait() is available in older distros, so use it instead of epoll_pwait() (removing the last NULL arg, the sigmask, makes it the same thing anyway) to avoid breaking the build. Cc: Adrian Hunter Cc: David Ahern Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Namhyung Kim Cc: Wang Nan Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-pwiwizloxt0jujy8em80qut3@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo --- diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-example.c b/tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-example.c index 0ec9c2c03164..e53bc91fa260 100644 --- a/tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-example.c +++ b/tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-example.c @@ -31,8 +31,8 @@ struct bpf_map_def SEC("maps") flip_table = { .max_entries = 1, }; -SEC("func=sys_epoll_pwait") -int bpf_func__sys_epoll_pwait(void *ctx) +SEC("func=sys_epoll_wait") +int bpf_func__sys_epoll_wait(void *ctx) { int ind =0; int *flag = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&flip_table, &ind); diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c b/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c index da0d87613975..fc54064b9186 100644 --- a/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c +++ b/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c @@ -13,13 +13,13 @@ #ifdef HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT -static int epoll_pwait_loop(void) +static int epoll_wait_loop(void) { int i; /* Should fail NR_ITERS times */ for (i = 0; i < NR_ITERS; i++) - epoll_pwait(-(i + 1), NULL, 0, 0, NULL); + epoll_wait(-(i + 1), NULL, 0, 0); return 0; } @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static struct { "[basic_bpf_test]", "fix 'perf test LLVM' first", "load bpf object failed", - &epoll_pwait_loop, + &epoll_wait_loop, (NR_ITERS + 1) / 2, }, #ifdef HAVE_BPF_PROLOGUE