From: Chao Yu Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 10:02:14 +0000 (+0800) Subject: f2fs: update several comments X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=4f4124d0b99682efa7307191a28ec050872d2079;p=GitHub%2Fexynos8895%2Fandroid_kernel_samsung_universal8895.git f2fs: update several comments Update several comments: 1. use f2fs_{un}lock_op install of mutex_{un}lock_op. 2. update comment of get_data_block(). 3. update description of node offset. Signed-off-by: Chao Yu Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim --- diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c index e46b5c52d2ed..0879d2aa97e6 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c @@ -508,8 +508,8 @@ repeat: * Caller ensures that this data page is never allocated. * A new zero-filled data page is allocated in the page cache. * - * Also, caller should grab and release a mutex by calling mutex_lock_op() and - * mutex_unlock_op(). + * Also, caller should grab and release a rwsem by calling f2fs_lock_op() and + * f2fs_unlock_op(). * Note that, npage is set only by make_empty_dir. */ struct page *get_new_data_page(struct inode *inode, @@ -595,10 +595,12 @@ static int __allocate_data_block(struct dnode_of_data *dn) } /* - * This function should be used by the data read flow only where it - * does not check the "create" flag that indicates block allocation. - * The reason for this special functionality is to exploit VFS readahead - * mechanism. + * get_data_block() now supported readahead/bmap/rw direct_IO with mapped bh. + * If original data blocks are allocated, then give them to blockdev. + * Otherwise, + * a. preallocate requested block addresses + * b. do not use extent cache for better performance + * c. give the block addresses to blockdev */ static int get_data_block(struct inode *inode, sector_t iblock, struct buffer_head *bh_result, int create) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/dir.c b/fs/f2fs/dir.c index 0cc26ba07c3b..28206109a293 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/dir.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/dir.c @@ -432,8 +432,8 @@ next: } /* - * Caller should grab and release a mutex by calling mutex_lock_op() and - * mutex_unlock_op(). + * Caller should grab and release a rwsem by calling f2fs_lock_op() and + * f2fs_unlock_op(). */ int __f2fs_add_link(struct inode *dir, const struct qstr *name, struct inode *inode) { diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h index 42f28d4134c9..ba91186823dd 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ enum { LOOKUP_NODE, /* look up a node without readahead */ LOOKUP_NODE_RA, /* * look up a node with readahead called - * by get_datablock_ro. + * by get_data_block. */ }; diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c index 0af0a715e367..e8fe52d6073c 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c @@ -393,8 +393,8 @@ got: /* * Caller should call f2fs_put_dnode(dn). - * Also, it should grab and release a mutex by calling mutex_lock_op() and - * mutex_unlock_op() only if ro is not set RDONLY_NODE. + * Also, it should grab and release a rwsem by calling f2fs_lock_op() and + * f2fs_unlock_op() only if ro is not set RDONLY_NODE. * In the case of RDONLY_NODE, we don't need to care about mutex. */ int get_dnode_of_data(struct dnode_of_data *dn, pgoff_t index, int mode) @@ -802,8 +802,8 @@ int truncate_xattr_node(struct inode *inode, struct page *page) } /* - * Caller should grab and release a mutex by calling mutex_lock_op() and - * mutex_unlock_op(). + * Caller should grab and release a rwsem by calling f2fs_lock_op() and + * f2fs_unlock_op(). */ void remove_inode_page(struct inode *inode) { diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.h b/fs/f2fs/node.h index 3496bb3e15dc..c4c79885c993 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/node.h +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.h @@ -224,7 +224,13 @@ static inline block_t next_blkaddr_of_node(struct page *node_page) * | `- direct node (5 + N => 5 + 2N - 1) * `- double indirect node (5 + 2N) * `- indirect node (6 + 2N) - * `- direct node (x(N + 1)) + * `- direct node + * ...... + * `- indirect node ((6 + 2N) + x(N + 1)) + * `- direct node + * ...... + * `- indirect node ((6 + 2N) + (N - 1)(N + 1)) + * `- direct node */ static inline bool IS_DNODE(struct page *node_page) {